Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
PDFS--Of the WotC Court Case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imban" data-source="post: 4915808" data-attributes="member: 29206"><p>You know, obviously this was just a snarky response, but I find it sort of telling that you're basically accusing someone of being a Filipino because he's dumb.</p><p></p><p>I mean, I used to chat with said kid from the Philippines who's being sued by WotC now on basically a daily basis and he fits... pretty much none of what you just listed.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Alright, here's a clear example. Say I, being a dishonourable scoundrel, the lowest of villains, and the surest of blackguards, want to provide a comrade of mine with a new video game to try out because I think that he may like it. The game has a demo, but I am a blackguard and wrongdoing is my forte.</p><p></p><p>Now, in order to provide him with a copy, I could ambush a shipping truck, callously murder the deliverymen, and retrieve a copy to bring to my comrade. Alternatively, I could send him a copy of my disc using the internet messenger of my choice. Alternatively, I could sneak through the darkest night to his home and deliver my disc to him in person, that he may play it for a few hours while I nap to regain my strength for more villainy.</p><p></p><p>Regardless of these, I discover that my comrade is brainless and without soul, and detests the game! In fact, he only played the introductory dungeon from the demo before quitting and uninstalling it. While contemplating whether or not to execute him for his folly, I might also reflect upon the alternative methods I could have used to allow him to come to that conclusion.</p><p></p><p>Now, for chaos and evil, clearly nothing can top murdering a deliveryman and stealing the product! I've not only killed someone - unimportant, really, he was just a retail peon - I've removed a physical product from circulation that a store could easily have sold to someone willing to purchase it. Clearly if I was to act as a mere courier-boy and deliver the disc to him, this would be neither unlawful nor malicious, at least in most cases. So what of the case where I delivered it to him over the internet?!</p><p></p><p>At this thought I might stroke my goatee and consider. It is surely unlawful, as all save the inept and deceitful know, but is it truly villainous? Surely it is <strong>less</strong> harmful than shivving an unsuspecting delivery-boy and taking another copy of the disc from his cooling hands - I mean, I'd be setting GameStop back some time to hire and train a new employee, too! - but is it <strong>more</strong> harmful than conveying the disc in person?</p><p></p><p>After pondering for a while, I would contest not. While it is true that I was not deprived of my own access to the game while my comrade tested it, in the end there would have been very little practical difference from instructing him to download the demo, except for how this process of piracy was somewhat more appealing to him. </p><p></p><p>...as an aside, it is now that I should mention that my comrade of whom I have been speaking so long is actually a Slaad. In fact, being a Slaad, he probably wouldn't have paid for it anyway, because funding organized systems like corporations doesn't really... work for him. Alignment issues, you understand? I can't tell you for certain, of course, because Slaadi are notorious individualists and the truly chaotic thing to do might have been to giant frog his way to GameStop and purchase it on a whim.</p><p></p><p>So in practice, while the decision to send him a file over the internet would really work a modron into a babbling, steam-emitting rage at how I scoff at the laws of the country and proper protocol, it's not doing the direct harm of thievery.</p><p></p><p>(...I really need a Snidely Whiplash emoticon for this post.)</p><p></p><p>On a serious note, the only way that some people rationalize that it does is through a strange conception, that every consumer necessarily represents a potential sale at the asking price. While piracy certainly highlights that this is not the case, basic economics also does - the lower your asking price, the <strong>more consumers you will get</strong>, almost without exception. For instance, many people have some interest in seeing a movie, but not enough interest to watch it in theatres, so they wait for the movie to be aired on television, where it is in and of itself free, as it is included as part of a cost that they are already paying regardless.</p><p></p><p>For them, the asking price of the movie - say, $10 - is higher than the price that they value the movie at - say, $2 - so there simply is no sale to be lost unless the asking price dips to $2 or less.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imban, post: 4915808, member: 29206"] You know, obviously this was just a snarky response, but I find it sort of telling that you're basically accusing someone of being a Filipino because he's dumb. I mean, I used to chat with said kid from the Philippines who's being sued by WotC now on basically a daily basis and he fits... pretty much none of what you just listed. Alright, here's a clear example. Say I, being a dishonourable scoundrel, the lowest of villains, and the surest of blackguards, want to provide a comrade of mine with a new video game to try out because I think that he may like it. The game has a demo, but I am a blackguard and wrongdoing is my forte. Now, in order to provide him with a copy, I could ambush a shipping truck, callously murder the deliverymen, and retrieve a copy to bring to my comrade. Alternatively, I could send him a copy of my disc using the internet messenger of my choice. Alternatively, I could sneak through the darkest night to his home and deliver my disc to him in person, that he may play it for a few hours while I nap to regain my strength for more villainy. Regardless of these, I discover that my comrade is brainless and without soul, and detests the game! In fact, he only played the introductory dungeon from the demo before quitting and uninstalling it. While contemplating whether or not to execute him for his folly, I might also reflect upon the alternative methods I could have used to allow him to come to that conclusion. Now, for chaos and evil, clearly nothing can top murdering a deliveryman and stealing the product! I've not only killed someone - unimportant, really, he was just a retail peon - I've removed a physical product from circulation that a store could easily have sold to someone willing to purchase it. Clearly if I was to act as a mere courier-boy and deliver the disc to him, this would be neither unlawful nor malicious, at least in most cases. So what of the case where I delivered it to him over the internet?! At this thought I might stroke my goatee and consider. It is surely unlawful, as all save the inept and deceitful know, but is it truly villainous? Surely it is [b]less[/b] harmful than shivving an unsuspecting delivery-boy and taking another copy of the disc from his cooling hands - I mean, I'd be setting GameStop back some time to hire and train a new employee, too! - but is it [b]more[/b] harmful than conveying the disc in person? After pondering for a while, I would contest not. While it is true that I was not deprived of my own access to the game while my comrade tested it, in the end there would have been very little practical difference from instructing him to download the demo, except for how this process of piracy was somewhat more appealing to him. ...as an aside, it is now that I should mention that my comrade of whom I have been speaking so long is actually a Slaad. In fact, being a Slaad, he probably wouldn't have paid for it anyway, because funding organized systems like corporations doesn't really... work for him. Alignment issues, you understand? I can't tell you for certain, of course, because Slaadi are notorious individualists and the truly chaotic thing to do might have been to giant frog his way to GameStop and purchase it on a whim. So in practice, while the decision to send him a file over the internet would really work a modron into a babbling, steam-emitting rage at how I scoff at the laws of the country and proper protocol, it's not doing the direct harm of thievery. (...I really need a Snidely Whiplash emoticon for this post.) On a serious note, the only way that some people rationalize that it does is through a strange conception, that every consumer necessarily represents a potential sale at the asking price. While piracy certainly highlights that this is not the case, basic economics also does - the lower your asking price, the [b]more consumers you will get[/b], almost without exception. For instance, many people have some interest in seeing a movie, but not enough interest to watch it in theatres, so they wait for the movie to be aired on television, where it is in and of itself free, as it is included as part of a cost that they are already paying regardless. For them, the asking price of the movie - say, $10 - is higher than the price that they value the movie at - say, $2 - so there simply is no sale to be lost unless the asking price dips to $2 or less. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
PDFS--Of the WotC Court Case
Top