Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
(PEACH) Controller-variant Ranger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eriktheguy" data-source="post: 5068635" data-attributes="member: 83662"><p>I like that you took 'stunned' out of the mix. Since it is strictly better than most (if not all) other conditions, it would be the only one the ranger ever used.</p><p>As far as editing what you have goes, I'm not sure there's much else to do. Some options would be cool though, maybe a few more feats for different versions of the hunter's quarry (such as extra damage, pushing). Powers would be cool too. One of my ideas are ranger two-target powers that allow you to use your quarry on both targets instead of just one (requiring either a bow, or two melee weapons to use). These powers could also work for non-controller rangers, allowing them to apply quarry damage to multiple foes (although it sounds like wording it properly would be a nightmare).</p><p>Another possibility is ranger powers that get an extra effect when you use your quarry:</p><p>If you use your quarry to daze the target of this attack, it is stunned instead</p><p>If you use your quarry to slow or immobilize the target of this attack, it gets a penalty to the saving throws equal to your wisdom modifier.</p><p>If you use your quarry to restrain the target of this attack, it takes ongoing 5 damage while restrained.</p><p></p><p>Anyways, the only way to tell if this build is broken or imbalanced is to test it out at your table! Test it by comparing it to another ranger at your table and having them fight in the same party. One ranger will be dealing an extra 1d6 damage per turn (per tier) and the other will be throwing on a status ailment every two or three turns. See if one of them is more valuable to the party than the other. Try a good combination of fights with varying numbers of minions. Also see how it plays out in a few solo encounters. I would expect the controller ranger to be the most useful in a solo encounter with a few weak enemies, recharging on the weak enemies and locking down the solo with daze.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eriktheguy, post: 5068635, member: 83662"] I like that you took 'stunned' out of the mix. Since it is strictly better than most (if not all) other conditions, it would be the only one the ranger ever used. As far as editing what you have goes, I'm not sure there's much else to do. Some options would be cool though, maybe a few more feats for different versions of the hunter's quarry (such as extra damage, pushing). Powers would be cool too. One of my ideas are ranger two-target powers that allow you to use your quarry on both targets instead of just one (requiring either a bow, or two melee weapons to use). These powers could also work for non-controller rangers, allowing them to apply quarry damage to multiple foes (although it sounds like wording it properly would be a nightmare). Another possibility is ranger powers that get an extra effect when you use your quarry: If you use your quarry to daze the target of this attack, it is stunned instead If you use your quarry to slow or immobilize the target of this attack, it gets a penalty to the saving throws equal to your wisdom modifier. If you use your quarry to restrain the target of this attack, it takes ongoing 5 damage while restrained. Anyways, the only way to tell if this build is broken or imbalanced is to test it out at your table! Test it by comparing it to another ranger at your table and having them fight in the same party. One ranger will be dealing an extra 1d6 damage per turn (per tier) and the other will be throwing on a status ailment every two or three turns. See if one of them is more valuable to the party than the other. Try a good combination of fights with varying numbers of minions. Also see how it plays out in a few solo encounters. I would expect the controller ranger to be the most useful in a solo encounter with a few weak enemies, recharging on the weak enemies and locking down the solo with daze. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
(PEACH) Controller-variant Ranger
Top