Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 8796625" data-attributes="member: 93670">I used proficiency dice for a couple campaigns &amp; they worked well after the initial breaking in period &amp; allowed some neat stuff like magic items that make say 1=2 or 1 &amp; 2=3 on the proficiency die for a thing to raise the average without raising the ceiling.&nbsp; I wouldn't mind them being default or a PHB variant to lower the bar for a gm wanting to use a rather innocuous rule.&nbsp; Most of the resistance was one or two players who got fussy because it was hard to use them in ddb even though they really wanted to use ddb instead of physical stuff.Flanking &amp; facing rules are almost written as if the author of those rules wanted to make sure nobody tried to use badwrongfun grid combat rather than ToTM, they could use massive improvementsI'd like to see body slots+explained slot affinities &amp; bonus types become an optional rule for use alongside attunement slots.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 8796625, member: 93670"] I used proficiency dice for a couple campaigns & they worked well after the initial breaking in period & allowed some neat stuff like magic items that make say 1=2 or 1 & 2=3 on the proficiency die for a thing to raise the average without raising the ceiling. I wouldn't mind them being default or a PHB variant to lower the bar for a gm wanting to use a rather innocuous rule. Most of the resistance was one or two players who got fussy because it was hard to use them in ddb even though they really wanted to use ddb instead of physical stuff. Flanking & facing rules are almost written as if the author of those rules wanted to make sure nobody tried to use badwrongfun grid combat rather than ToTM, they could use massive improvements I'd like to see body slots+explained slot affinities & bonus types become an optional rule for use alongside attunement slots. [/QUOTE]

Verification