Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Anthtriel" data-source="post: 3859161" data-attributes="member: 13764">You have a point, but I believe to qualify as trolling, the actual post needs to be provocative. From my point of view, what I did is just what newspapers (especially bad newspapers, though) tend to do: Provocative title, not provocative content. Unless people don't get past the title, there is no flame potential. And I'll say openly that I don't care much for people who believe they need to contribute to a thread despite not even reading the opening post.&nbsp;Kudos to you for your reaction. Honestly.And I will change my opinion, but only slightly: I believe you read the first few paragraphs, but not the (admittedly long-winded) example. It makes perfect sense in that case.Recharge after every two minutes would be horrible, I agree. That's why I made it a point (only in the example though, I think), to make it two minutes of actual rest. That's extremely easy to track of, even easier than per day.I disagree, I believe there should be an actual benefit for resting (a relatively small amount of time). Look at the example for details. (Well granted, it probably comes off as &quot;taking a nap&quot;, though I rather think of &quot;catching breath&quot;)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Anthtriel, post: 3859161, member: 13764"] You have a point, but I believe to qualify as trolling, the actual post needs to be provocative. From my point of view, what I did is just what newspapers (especially bad newspapers, though) tend to do: Provocative title, not provocative content. Unless people don't get past the title, there is no flame potential. And I'll say openly that I don't care much for people who believe they need to contribute to a thread despite not even reading the opening post. Kudos to you for your reaction. Honestly. And I will change my opinion, but only slightly: I believe you read the first few paragraphs, but not the (admittedly long-winded) example. It makes perfect sense in that case. Recharge after every two minutes would be horrible, I agree. That's why I made it a point (only in the example though, I think), to make it two minutes of actual rest. That's extremely easy to track of, even easier than per day. I disagree, I believe there should be an actual benefit for resting (a relatively small amount of time). Look at the example for details. (Well granted, it probably comes off as "taking a nap", though I rather think of "catching breath") [/QUOTE]

Verification