Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Perception from Dexterity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sadrik" data-source="post: 4822802" data-attributes="member: 14506"><p>I actually have quite a lot to say on this subject.<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":eek:" /></p><p></p><p>1. Switching stats around in 4e seems to be well within the purview of the game. Take INT as your example of non-reality. Supposedly I am so smart it allows me to dodge better. Why, because I can tell the trajectory of the attack? What about when I put heavy armor on, now I am not so smart I guess? These kinds of examples are riddled throughout the 4e rules set. So stats really don't represent anything other than a number which may have some small minor effect tied to it. Stats are so important to combat they force your hand and basically cookie cut your character for you. Some times the designers created your character the way you want and some times they didn't.</p><p></p><p>I really don't see a problem with the stats going to different skills. An early 4e house rule I was toying with did just that it stripped away the switcheroo defenses (which causes stat polarity) resetting them back to their more natural 3e format. At the same time, I made all of the skills allowed to be used with the highest of two possible stats. So for instance, Heal was INT or WIS etc. This could be a possible solution for you.</p><p></p><p>2. Wisdom has always been one of the most ill conceived stats. It has even gotten worse in 4e. It is literally a catch-all that has no specific meaning. It is a place for certain types of knowledge (healing, nature and dungeoneering), is also represents your keen senses, it also represents your ability to ward off mental effects, hunches, telling lies, and it finally represents divine magic for the cleric (well so does STR). So, if you ask me it is the problem of the stat and not so much the problem of if perception should be somewhere else.</p><p></p><p>I have always favored wisdom representing "Awareness" and "Willpower" and none of the other aspects. However, in 4e the stats don't really represent anything other than a number. Certain things are tied down, but others are simply, hand waved as "whatevers". For instance STR still represents encumbrance, CON still represents HP and each stat has an associated list of skills, but pretty much everything else in the system is up for grabs. Who would have thought you could fight as bad ass as Conan with an 8 STR and 18 INT - you can - there's a feat!</p><p></p><p>I think that the current incarnation of D&D would be a better game with 5 stats instead of 6. Without a true calling WIS can easily be spread into INT and CHA. One of my hopes for a 5e would be to give WIS a true calling like it never has had in the past.</p><p></p><p>3. In 1e perception was not linked to any stat it was simply a d6 (if I recall correctly a 1 in 6 and elves a 2 in 6 and thieves had a similar starting percentage and it went up from there). Perception skill could simply be nixed in favor of a simpler format that is not tied to any stat. Many games have a perception "stat", rather than a skill.</p><p></p><p>4. Another approach for fixing your concern is the notion that certain classes are forced into only two ways because of all of the side benefits they get for having there stats in that way. I think that there really are a lot of fixes here, but my favorite is the idea that the prime stat is fixed, but the player can decide what their secondary stat is. You want to be a wise rogue, no sweat. Just have a high DEX, and place your second highest stat in WIS, all of your secondary stat effects trigger off of that stat so you don't lose anything for doing it that way.</p><p></p><p>5. Finally the last approach is to make perception a defense and give certain classes bonuses (Ranger +2, Rogue +2, and perhaps Warlord a +1). It is already a mini-defense in the form of passive perception give it full-bore credibility with the +1/2 level + WIS or DEX or some such and be done with it. When someone wants to "actively" search, use thievery for traps, nature for tracks outdoors etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sadrik, post: 4822802, member: 14506"] I actually have quite a lot to say on this subject.:lol::eek: 1. Switching stats around in 4e seems to be well within the purview of the game. Take INT as your example of non-reality. Supposedly I am so smart it allows me to dodge better. Why, because I can tell the trajectory of the attack? What about when I put heavy armor on, now I am not so smart I guess? These kinds of examples are riddled throughout the 4e rules set. So stats really don't represent anything other than a number which may have some small minor effect tied to it. Stats are so important to combat they force your hand and basically cookie cut your character for you. Some times the designers created your character the way you want and some times they didn't. I really don't see a problem with the stats going to different skills. An early 4e house rule I was toying with did just that it stripped away the switcheroo defenses (which causes stat polarity) resetting them back to their more natural 3e format. At the same time, I made all of the skills allowed to be used with the highest of two possible stats. So for instance, Heal was INT or WIS etc. This could be a possible solution for you. 2. Wisdom has always been one of the most ill conceived stats. It has even gotten worse in 4e. It is literally a catch-all that has no specific meaning. It is a place for certain types of knowledge (healing, nature and dungeoneering), is also represents your keen senses, it also represents your ability to ward off mental effects, hunches, telling lies, and it finally represents divine magic for the cleric (well so does STR). So, if you ask me it is the problem of the stat and not so much the problem of if perception should be somewhere else. I have always favored wisdom representing "Awareness" and "Willpower" and none of the other aspects. However, in 4e the stats don't really represent anything other than a number. Certain things are tied down, but others are simply, hand waved as "whatevers". For instance STR still represents encumbrance, CON still represents HP and each stat has an associated list of skills, but pretty much everything else in the system is up for grabs. Who would have thought you could fight as bad ass as Conan with an 8 STR and 18 INT - you can - there's a feat! I think that the current incarnation of D&D would be a better game with 5 stats instead of 6. Without a true calling WIS can easily be spread into INT and CHA. One of my hopes for a 5e would be to give WIS a true calling like it never has had in the past. 3. In 1e perception was not linked to any stat it was simply a d6 (if I recall correctly a 1 in 6 and elves a 2 in 6 and thieves had a similar starting percentage and it went up from there). Perception skill could simply be nixed in favor of a simpler format that is not tied to any stat. Many games have a perception "stat", rather than a skill. 4. Another approach for fixing your concern is the notion that certain classes are forced into only two ways because of all of the side benefits they get for having there stats in that way. I think that there really are a lot of fixes here, but my favorite is the idea that the prime stat is fixed, but the player can decide what their secondary stat is. You want to be a wise rogue, no sweat. Just have a high DEX, and place your second highest stat in WIS, all of your secondary stat effects trigger off of that stat so you don't lose anything for doing it that way. 5. Finally the last approach is to make perception a defense and give certain classes bonuses (Ranger +2, Rogue +2, and perhaps Warlord a +1). It is already a mini-defense in the form of passive perception give it full-bore credibility with the +1/2 level + WIS or DEX or some such and be done with it. When someone wants to "actively" search, use thievery for traps, nature for tracks outdoors etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Perception from Dexterity
Top