Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pielorinho" data-source="post: 3017677" data-attributes="member: 259">I have a question about the text of the permanency spell.  I'm most interested in the spirit of the rules, common-sense interpretations, and balance, although programmatic Rules-As-Written interpretations can be interesting as well.Here's the text; the question follows:Okay, my question is this.  For the list of spells you make permanent on yourself, it specifies that you cast the spell and then cast permanence.  There is no such specification for spells cast on others.  Does this mean that caster A may cast (for example) greater magic fang on Frank, and caster B may then cast permanence?There's an NPC wizard cohort in our party with permanence; as the party druid, I cast Greater Magic Fang about four times every day (once on the monk, twice on me, once on my companion).  If the cohort could cast permanence on GMF, that would drastically free up my spell list.I'm inclined on one hand to think this is cheesy, that they misplaced a sentence that should apply to all castings of permanence.  On the other hand, GMF only appears on the druid/ranger lists, meaning that you'd need to be at least a druid5/mage9 to cast this combination; that combination is so absurdly rare that this wouldn't even appear if that was the intent.  (Of course a PC with crazy UMF and scrolls could also do it, but again, totally rare).What do y'all think?  Can we do this?Daniel</blockquote>