Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 219386" data-attributes="member: 2829">Gotcha. It was the referrence to MR that threw me off track. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Well, see, that's the funny part. If you're gonna bother researching a new spell, you might as well try to customize it as much as you can. Making more of an effort or less of an effort really has nothing to do with it. Why? A regeneration spell with a different range descriptor takes the same amount of time to research as a regeneration spell that is completely redesigned (so long as both are of the same spell level as the original), so why not customize it in any way you can? This kind of forethought tells me that you are using your creativity to it's utmost potential, or that you're at least making the effort to do so, instead of you just saying "The range sucks because I can't use it with Persistent Spell, so I think I'll just change that". Taking this kind of rash action could very well result in you not discovering other ways to improve the spell. Of course, if your character is an impatient spellcaster anyways, then that's really damn good roleplaying in my book.</blockquote>