Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gabrion" data-source="post: 2212907" data-attributes="member: 30779">Hyp, thanks for helping and being understanding.&nbsp; If all goes well, this should be my last question to clrify things.I understand your view to be roughly &quot;the 3.0 FAQ clarified vague rules, so if those rules didn't change in 3.5, it's still good.&quot;&nbsp; Just corect me if I misiterpreted, but I think you make it pretty simple. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp; So the question I'm left with is one I've brought up several times.&nbsp; What if the FAQ clarifies a rule, but gets it wrong?&nbsp; The best example of this is in a question I asked before.Most people I know have forsaken the idea that AMF blocks line of effect (cringes and prepares for Hyp to undo his existence), so how do we justify the fact that the 3.0 FAQ was responsible for &quot;clarifying&quot; this vague rule, and nothing since then has changed it?&nbsp; I guess I'm just wondering why we should assume the 3.0 FAQ got things right.&nbsp; After all, the whole reason for 3.5 at all was because 3.0 was messed up in too many ways (and WotC wante money).&nbsp; Thanks for the help.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gabrion, post: 2212907, member: 30779"] Hyp, thanks for helping and being understanding. If all goes well, this should be my last question to clrify things. I understand your view to be roughly "the 3.0 FAQ clarified vague rules, so if those rules didn't change in 3.5, it's still good." Just corect me if I misiterpreted, but I think you make it pretty simple. ;) So the question I'm left with is one I've brought up several times. What if the FAQ clarifies a rule, but gets it wrong? The best example of this is in a question I asked before. Most people I know have forsaken the idea that AMF blocks line of effect (cringes and prepares for Hyp to undo his existence), so how do we justify the fact that the 3.0 FAQ was responsible for "clarifying" this vague rule, and nothing since then has changed it? I guess I'm just wondering why we should assume the 3.0 FAQ got things right. After all, the whole reason for 3.5 at all was because 3.0 was messed up in too many ways (and WotC wante money). Thanks for the help. [/QUOTE]

Verification