Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Persuade, Intimidate, and Deceive used vs. PCs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 6735183" data-attributes="member: 6787503"><p>As to why NPCs have these skills if they are not meant to influence and/or compel the decisions of PCs, first I would point to the odd man out, Deception. Unlike the other two social skills, Deception can apply in two slightly different situations. The first, the typical social interaction check, is one in which a character is attempting to influence another creature in order to gain the creature's compliance with some request or demand. If that attempt is based on a falsehood, then skill in Deception would apply. A PC cannot be influenced by such a check because the premise of roleplaying is that the player assumes the role of his or her character. A PC's actions cannot determined by such a check because they depend solely on the decisions of the player. Persuasion and Intimidation are likewise unable to influence the player's decisions with respect to his or her PC. The best way to resolve such a situation is for the DM, as the NPC, to lie to the player, and for the player to decide on the PC's response. No check, and therefore no skill, need be involved.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, if the player suspects a falsehood, and seeks to verify the truthfulness of the NPC's statement through observations of the NPC's body language, etc, and the DM asks for a Wisdom (Insight) check from the PC, then this can be contested by the NPC's Charisma (Deception) check. The outcome of this check, however, does not determine whether the PC is compelled to any sort of action if the lie is found to be believable, but only whether falseness is in fact detected.</p><p></p><p>Looking at the DM's Basic Rules, the four monsters/NPCs skilled in Deception are the Doppelganger, Medusa, Green Dragon, and Cultist. All of them are figures who are likely to lie to the PCs. Their skill in Deception will not come up however unless they attempt to deceive other NPCs, or if a PC attempts to uncover their falsehood.</p><p></p><p>Intimidation and Persuasion are both very similar to one another in that they both represent an attempt to influence through force of personality without resorting to falsehood. Intimidation is backed up with threats, and Persuasion is supported by good manners, or compelling arguments. There is no action that parallels the discovery of falsehood in the case of an interaction that relies on these skills, so if an NPC is attempting to persuade or intimidate a PC, no check is required. The outcome depends solely on the player's decision.</p><p></p><p>Orcs and Thugs make a Charisma (Intimidation) check to keep their own allies, or lesser creatures, in line, given that social skills are more effective when used on friendly creatures. Likewise, a Priest will use his skill in Persuasion, not to boost a Charisma check the outcome of which will determine the PCs actions, but rather to influence the actions of of another NPC. If the PCs take action to elicit the opposite outcome, as [MENTION=97077]iserith[/MENTION] has pointed out, these become contested checks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hriston, post: 6735183, member: 6787503"] As to why NPCs have these skills if they are not meant to influence and/or compel the decisions of PCs, first I would point to the odd man out, Deception. Unlike the other two social skills, Deception can apply in two slightly different situations. The first, the typical social interaction check, is one in which a character is attempting to influence another creature in order to gain the creature's compliance with some request or demand. If that attempt is based on a falsehood, then skill in Deception would apply. A PC cannot be influenced by such a check because the premise of roleplaying is that the player assumes the role of his or her character. A PC's actions cannot determined by such a check because they depend solely on the decisions of the player. Persuasion and Intimidation are likewise unable to influence the player's decisions with respect to his or her PC. The best way to resolve such a situation is for the DM, as the NPC, to lie to the player, and for the player to decide on the PC's response. No check, and therefore no skill, need be involved. On the other hand, if the player suspects a falsehood, and seeks to verify the truthfulness of the NPC's statement through observations of the NPC's body language, etc, and the DM asks for a Wisdom (Insight) check from the PC, then this can be contested by the NPC's Charisma (Deception) check. The outcome of this check, however, does not determine whether the PC is compelled to any sort of action if the lie is found to be believable, but only whether falseness is in fact detected. Looking at the DM's Basic Rules, the four monsters/NPCs skilled in Deception are the Doppelganger, Medusa, Green Dragon, and Cultist. All of them are figures who are likely to lie to the PCs. Their skill in Deception will not come up however unless they attempt to deceive other NPCs, or if a PC attempts to uncover their falsehood. Intimidation and Persuasion are both very similar to one another in that they both represent an attempt to influence through force of personality without resorting to falsehood. Intimidation is backed up with threats, and Persuasion is supported by good manners, or compelling arguments. There is no action that parallels the discovery of falsehood in the case of an interaction that relies on these skills, so if an NPC is attempting to persuade or intimidate a PC, no check is required. The outcome depends solely on the player's decision. Orcs and Thugs make a Charisma (Intimidation) check to keep their own allies, or lesser creatures, in line, given that social skills are more effective when used on friendly creatures. Likewise, a Priest will use his skill in Persuasion, not to boost a Charisma check the outcome of which will determine the PCs actions, but rather to influence the actions of of another NPC. If the PCs take action to elicit the opposite outcome, as [MENTION=97077]iserith[/MENTION] has pointed out, these become contested checks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Persuade, Intimidate, and Deceive used vs. PCs
Top