Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Shemeska" data-source="post: 1537853" data-attributes="member: 11697">The player who plays a class, any class, just because of the abilities it gives, without any regard to the in game consequences: case in point the paladin of Tyr who had to be argued with out of game that he had to make some sort of honest attempt to tithe to his church. Similarly the player who wants to be a half-fiend/half-celestial/anarchic redeemed fallen celestial vampire.The player who uses the argument, "Where does it say that? Show me where in the rules it says that!" Basically I despise munchkins, I despise even more those munchkins who get their arguments wrong, and I despise rules lawyers who can back them up in excrutiating detail even more.More of a bemused roll of my eyes rather than a peeve, but: the female character who routinely plays gay male characters that are slutty.Mercurial greatswords: they will break your NPCs and then your game. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />New material in 3e that has a blatant disregard for the material that it was based upon and was seemingly rewritten for the simple whimsy or ignorance of the writer on the prior material. Illithid arcane casters, formians overrunning Mechanus, nerfed modrons, almost as badly nerfed Yugoloths, etc</blockquote>

Verification