Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wocky" data-source="post: 1540366" data-attributes="member: 11408">- A DM who'll refuse to use a battle grid and suggest we use graph paper, a pencil, and eraser instead. Gaaahhh!- INT checks used to hand over the plot to the player a spoonful at a time.- Monsters not played intelligently who you wouldn't be able to defeat if they were.- A DM who provides more difficult challenges by lowering the PCs abilities instead of buffing up the encounters.- Players who never consider playing one of the core classes on one of the core races. I hate it when they particularly insist on using something off one campaign setting while playing in another with different flavour.- DMs who arbritrarily prohibit feats that they think are unbalanced and never saw them used in an unbalancing way (or at all).- The &quot;No way I'm playing a GOOD character&quot; syndrome (through which everyone is either LN or CN).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wocky, post: 1540366, member: 11408"] - A DM who'll refuse to use a battle grid and suggest we use graph paper, a pencil, and eraser instead. Gaaahhh! - INT checks used to hand over the plot to the player a spoonful at a time. - Monsters not played intelligently who you wouldn't be able to defeat if they were. - A DM who provides more difficult challenges by lowering the PCs abilities instead of buffing up the encounters. - Players who never consider playing one of the core classes on one of the core races. I hate it when they particularly insist on using something off one campaign setting while playing in another with different flavour. - DMs who arbritrarily prohibit feats that they think are unbalanced and never saw them used in an unbalancing way (or at all). - The "No way I'm playing a GOOD character" syndrome (through which everyone is either LN or CN). [/QUOTE]

Verification