Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PF Ultimate Campaign Relationships and Artifacts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SkidAce" data-source="post: 6142010" data-attributes="member: 7706"><p>I liked the 4th edition concordance rules, and may still use them for my current Pathfinder game. (easy to move over)</p><p></p><p>But looking at the "relationship" from the Pathfinder Ultimate Campaign Guide, they could be used to track your "relationship" with an artifact.</p><p></p><p>Relationship runs from 5 to 30 points, and 4E concordance ran from 0 (or lower) to 20, so it's close.</p><p></p><p>With the PF rules, there are rules for gaining points in the relationship via diplomacy, (forging a bond with the artifact), special events, via gifts (or a task for the artifact) etc.</p><p></p><p>You can only do these things so many times per level, keeping it from spiralling out of control ("I had 20 encounters with undead, does the <em>Rod of Orcus</em> love me?").</p><p></p><p>And there is room for the DM to add in special bonuses based on plot (i.e helping or hindering the goals of the artifact).</p><p></p><p></p><p>I especially like the idea of the Difficulty Class for the player's check to improve concordance being based on its current relationship level, making the DC scale up and requiring perhaps more effort.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Haven't thought of any downsides (other than re-fluffing some of the terms). Since an artifact is "supposed" to have a personality, treating it as a relationship seems...neat...natural...etc.</p><p></p><p>And since I can't think of any downsides, I posted here....<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SkidAce, post: 6142010, member: 7706"] I liked the 4th edition concordance rules, and may still use them for my current Pathfinder game. (easy to move over) But looking at the "relationship" from the Pathfinder Ultimate Campaign Guide, they could be used to track your "relationship" with an artifact. Relationship runs from 5 to 30 points, and 4E concordance ran from 0 (or lower) to 20, so it's close. With the PF rules, there are rules for gaining points in the relationship via diplomacy, (forging a bond with the artifact), special events, via gifts (or a task for the artifact) etc. You can only do these things so many times per level, keeping it from spiralling out of control ("I had 20 encounters with undead, does the [I]Rod of Orcus[/I] love me?"). And there is room for the DM to add in special bonuses based on plot (i.e helping or hindering the goals of the artifact). I especially like the idea of the Difficulty Class for the player's check to improve concordance being based on its current relationship level, making the DC scale up and requiring perhaps more effort. Haven't thought of any downsides (other than re-fluffing some of the terms). Since an artifact is "supposed" to have a personality, treating it as a relationship seems...neat...natural...etc. And since I can't think of any downsides, I posted here....:D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PF Ultimate Campaign Relationships and Artifacts
Top