Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Thomas Shey" data-source="post: 8391678" data-attributes="member: 7026617">Here's the difference: while I think you sometimes overstate some things, its clear that some things are simply a case you have different expectations and needs than what PF2e is trying to serve, and don't want to try and hammer PF2e in it because (as I mentioned in regard to the other poster), why should you?&nbsp; Trying to use the proper tool for the job is a virtue; as Keneda has mentioned, its better than the situation with some 5e fans who have a &quot;when you have a big hammer&quot; approach.The problem with CZ is that he is apparently incapable of accepting that anyone can have a view different from his on the problems he sees with PF2e and come by them legitimately.&nbsp; So he massively begs the question, and outright accuses people who don't accept that of arguing in bad faith.&nbsp; That's not a feeling I get from any other PF2e critic around here.(And that doesn't even getting into the question about whether hopping into every thread about a game you dislike to let everyone know it.&nbsp; FATE and PbtA games don't work for me, and I'll sometimes mention that and why if it comes up, but I don't usually post in threads here or elsewhere that are dedicated to those systems or individual games based on them, because people have a right to like what they like and that they don't suit me doesn't change that.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Thomas Shey, post: 8391678, member: 7026617"] Here's the difference: while I think you sometimes overstate some things, its clear that some things are simply a case you have different expectations and needs than what PF2e is trying to serve, and don't want to try and hammer PF2e in it because (as I mentioned in regard to the other poster), why should you? Trying to use the proper tool for the job is a virtue; as Keneda has mentioned, its better than the situation with some 5e fans who have a "when you have a big hammer" approach. The problem with CZ is that he is apparently incapable of accepting that anyone can have a view different from his on the problems he sees with PF2e and come by them legitimately. So he massively begs the question, and outright accuses people who don't accept that of arguing in bad faith. That's not a feeling I get from any other PF2e critic around here. (And that doesn't even getting into the question about whether hopping into every thread about a game you dislike to let everyone know it. FATE and PbtA games don't work for me, and I'll sometimes mention that and why if it comes up, but I don't usually post in threads here or elsewhere that are dedicated to those systems or individual games based on them, because people have a right to like what they like and that they don't suit me doesn't change that.) [/QUOTE]

Verification