Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
PH3 Playtest Race: Wilden
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 4768446" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>Races are a strange beast.</p><p></p><p>WotC seems to be treating them like classes, which isn't the smartest idea. Classes are more modular: introduce a new class, and your character can then multiclass (assuming there's multiclass feats?) pretty quickly, gaining its powers. </p><p></p><p>Introduce a new race, and you are saying: "Time for a new character!" You can't retrain yourself as a killoren, or as a gnome. It's one of the few immutable parts of your character sheet in 4e. </p><p></p><p>So they're less easily usable; you need fewer races than classes in the game.</p><p></p><p>What you do sort of need is a way to turn any creature into a PC race. Some people like the standard fantasy milieu, some people wanna play beholders and sentient squid. You will never be able to anticipate the races people actually want vs. the ones who will never be used. The most efficient solution is to make creatures easily convertible between the DM's side of the screen and the player's. 3e tried to do that, but didn't do so great of a job. 4e has abandoned that idea, and so needs to play the odds a bit more. As they run out of races with significant game history, they're going to wander more and more into the realm of "why should I care?"</p><p></p><p>A new race only adds to an ongoing game a cast of NPC's and a potential race for new/dead PC's or re-started campaigns. In 4e, the weight is more on the latter, since NPC's don't need stats, and player stats can't be used as combat stats. Each new race says "Start a new game with me!" Of course, given the duration of most D&D campaigns (and the reasons they fall apart), and the rarity of true death (especially in 4e), they aren't even very useful for that. I suppose it allows characters to "retire?"</p><p></p><p>People are saying that the killoren sounds more like a monster but, really, almost any new race is going to be pretty monstrous. Heck, the dragonborn, and the eladrin are pretty monstrous, as-written. </p><p></p><p>A lot of the time, when a race is seen as a "monster," the DM usually means that they aren't mundane enough -- a lot of DMs in this thread don't want killoren wandering around their cities, or farming the fields of their town. It's important, usually, to have a PC race capable of doing mundane things: it makes the adventurers of the race more exceptional. Human adventurers are awesome because most humans are dirt-farmers. Killoren adventurers might not be so awesome, compared to other killoren. </p><p></p><p>4e, I think, has difficulty making anything mundane (similar to 3e before it). It's intentional, but it also works against the goal of providing new PC races -- a goal which, as I pointed out above, has limited returns in the first place.</p><p></p><p>I like weird races, and the race itself certainly has a place in my world, but I'm not holding my breath for it ever to be actually used, unless maybe I get a chance to play. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 4768446, member: 2067"] Races are a strange beast. WotC seems to be treating them like classes, which isn't the smartest idea. Classes are more modular: introduce a new class, and your character can then multiclass (assuming there's multiclass feats?) pretty quickly, gaining its powers. Introduce a new race, and you are saying: "Time for a new character!" You can't retrain yourself as a killoren, or as a gnome. It's one of the few immutable parts of your character sheet in 4e. So they're less easily usable; you need fewer races than classes in the game. What you do sort of need is a way to turn any creature into a PC race. Some people like the standard fantasy milieu, some people wanna play beholders and sentient squid. You will never be able to anticipate the races people actually want vs. the ones who will never be used. The most efficient solution is to make creatures easily convertible between the DM's side of the screen and the player's. 3e tried to do that, but didn't do so great of a job. 4e has abandoned that idea, and so needs to play the odds a bit more. As they run out of races with significant game history, they're going to wander more and more into the realm of "why should I care?" A new race only adds to an ongoing game a cast of NPC's and a potential race for new/dead PC's or re-started campaigns. In 4e, the weight is more on the latter, since NPC's don't need stats, and player stats can't be used as combat stats. Each new race says "Start a new game with me!" Of course, given the duration of most D&D campaigns (and the reasons they fall apart), and the rarity of true death (especially in 4e), they aren't even very useful for that. I suppose it allows characters to "retire?" People are saying that the killoren sounds more like a monster but, really, almost any new race is going to be pretty monstrous. Heck, the dragonborn, and the eladrin are pretty monstrous, as-written. A lot of the time, when a race is seen as a "monster," the DM usually means that they aren't mundane enough -- a lot of DMs in this thread don't want killoren wandering around their cities, or farming the fields of their town. It's important, usually, to have a PC race capable of doing mundane things: it makes the adventurers of the race more exceptional. Human adventurers are awesome because most humans are dirt-farmers. Killoren adventurers might not be so awesome, compared to other killoren. 4e, I think, has difficulty making anything mundane (similar to 3e before it). It's intentional, but it also works against the goal of providing new PC races -- a goal which, as I pointed out above, has limited returns in the first place. I like weird races, and the race itself certainly has a place in my world, but I'm not holding my breath for it ever to be actually used, unless maybe I get a chance to play. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
PH3 Playtest Race: Wilden
Top