Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Grunker" data-source="post: 5691179" data-attributes="member: 6667966">Oh, let me be clear. I have nothing against the fact that you dislike the compendium (hell, if it's bad it's bad), and I have even less against you not having the time to throw some constructive criticism at it (hell, I finished my degree in European Studies alongside making this compendium so I know the feeling).What I do have something against is you paying a visit to the thread just to throw a snarky one-liner my way. It won't do me, the players or the project any good <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />In essence, criticism is what I came here for (that is, people telling me what is crap and why) but I need the why for the project to grow in a constructive direction. In the end, it exists for my campaign to get better.With regards to this last bit:I will need a clarification. If it is aimed at my thoughts on balance, well, we like our gamism around our table. Hence my desire to allow as much as possible of the 3.5 stuff for my players to use (which is why I have to up the power of my own creations a bit).If aimed at something else I must admit my powers of comprehension may be too limited to follow you. I apologize.</blockquote>