Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PHB classes -- why does it matter which ones are included?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Falling Icicle" data-source="post: 4077084" data-attributes="member: 17077"><p>Wanting to be able to play a class or race that's been a part of D&D for many years or decades is selfish? Come on. I'd have much rather they included the Druid, Gnome, etc in the PHB and saved the more exotic races (Tieflings and Dragonborn) for a later supplement. And heck, even from a marketing standpoint this makes sense. If they really think that Druids, Monks, Gnomes etc will be much less popular than Tieflings, Dragonborn and Warlocks, less people will be interested in buying PHB2. </p><p></p><p>And then, of course, there's the whole part about all the people they turned off from 4e entirely because they completely neglected to provide for those who actually *gasp* liked playing some of the things that were core in older editions, and are now SOL for possibly years. Two of the people in my gaming group are extremely reluctant to move to 4e because their favorite classes (Monk and Druid) won't be included. I doubt that mine is the only gaming group that will be running into such issues. Sure, those classes and races may be the smallest minority in popularity, but when you add all of them together, I'm sure you're looking at a pretty significant number of players. And of course, I also feel that this shouldn't be entirely about statistics and polls. Many of us have been playing this game for years, and are rightly pissed when WotC refuses to throw us a fricking bone.</p><p></p><p>So this is a bad move on WotC's part for two big reasons, those they turned off because they feel neglected and snubbed, and also the fact that PHB2 and beyond will be less potentially popular by featuring what they admit are the least popular options. It would have been a much wiser thing to include all of the old core races and classes in the PHB, and saved the newer, supposedly more attractive options for later books. They wouldn't have pissed off any of their old customers, and there later books would entice a larger audience.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Falling Icicle, post: 4077084, member: 17077"] Wanting to be able to play a class or race that's been a part of D&D for many years or decades is selfish? Come on. I'd have much rather they included the Druid, Gnome, etc in the PHB and saved the more exotic races (Tieflings and Dragonborn) for a later supplement. And heck, even from a marketing standpoint this makes sense. If they really think that Druids, Monks, Gnomes etc will be much less popular than Tieflings, Dragonborn and Warlocks, less people will be interested in buying PHB2. And then, of course, there's the whole part about all the people they turned off from 4e entirely because they completely neglected to provide for those who actually *gasp* liked playing some of the things that were core in older editions, and are now SOL for possibly years. Two of the people in my gaming group are extremely reluctant to move to 4e because their favorite classes (Monk and Druid) won't be included. I doubt that mine is the only gaming group that will be running into such issues. Sure, those classes and races may be the smallest minority in popularity, but when you add all of them together, I'm sure you're looking at a pretty significant number of players. And of course, I also feel that this shouldn't be entirely about statistics and polls. Many of us have been playing this game for years, and are rightly pissed when WotC refuses to throw us a fricking bone. So this is a bad move on WotC's part for two big reasons, those they turned off because they feel neglected and snubbed, and also the fact that PHB2 and beyond will be less potentially popular by featuring what they admit are the least popular options. It would have been a much wiser thing to include all of the old core races and classes in the PHB, and saved the newer, supposedly more attractive options for later books. They wouldn't have pissed off any of their old customers, and there later books would entice a larger audience. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PHB classes -- why does it matter which ones are included?
Top