Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jer" data-source="post: 7821754" data-attributes="member: 19857">Nobody does this.&nbsp; Nobody makes a Pact Blade warlock and says &quot;instead of a sword, my pact blade is my forehead.&quot;&nbsp; And if someone decided to do it (possibly because one of my smart-alec players is reading this) as a DM I'd have options:1. &quot;Okay Derrick, you can do that.&nbsp; A headbutt does 1d4 damage - write it down.&quot;2. &quot;I mean, if you want to I guess, but why? Why would you do that?&quot;3. &quot;Anyone else have a problem with Derrick using his forehead as a pact weapon? No? Okay - 1d4 damage and let me know if you change your mind.&quot;4. &quot;No Derrick, you're only asking cause you saw that post on enworld and you know how much you regretted the last joke character you made. So, no.&quot;Rulings, not rules.&nbsp; If a rule leads to a stupid result the table can say no.&nbsp; But trying to cover every corner case is just a waste and not how this edition was supposed to be designed.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jer, post: 7821754, member: 19857"] Nobody does this. Nobody makes a Pact Blade warlock and says "instead of a sword, my pact blade is my forehead." And if someone decided to do it (possibly because one of my smart-alec players is reading this) as a DM I'd have options: 1. "Okay Derrick, you can do that. A headbutt does 1d4 damage - write it down." 2. "I mean, if you want to I guess, but why? Why would you do that?" 3. "Anyone else have a problem with Derrick using his forehead as a pact weapon? No? Okay - 1d4 damage and let me know if you change your mind." 4. "No Derrick, you're only asking cause you saw that post on enworld and you know how much you regretted the last joke character you made. So, no." Rulings, not rules. If a rule leads to a stupid result the table can say no. But trying to cover every corner case is just a waste and not how this edition was supposed to be designed. [/QUOTE]

Verification