Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DeJoker" data-source="post: 7229527" data-attributes="member: 6907519">Correct and that is why you would most likely never create a Feat such as that and I never suggest that one should. However that does not remove the game balance of what the designers implemented.  I mean shoot if we went to that extreme with just about anything within the game design you would pretty much break everything.  For instance if you made Tough equivalent to a +2 Con you would probably end up with a +6 or more to your hit points per level and most folks would say that was not balanced as well and is why you do not see any Feats that do such a thing.  Aka just because you can does not mean you should.This is why I commented somewhere either here or a similar thread as this one, that a +2 Attribute uses a Shotgun technic and a Feat uses more of a Rifle technic and because of this you have to be very careful as to how much you put into a Feat because it can quickly get out of hand and break the system without really trying to.So in respect to armor, if it were me I would build a more shotgun version of a series of feats so that in order to go from No Armor to Heavy Armor and Shield would take 4 Feats and I do not think you would argue that is not fair since that is sort of what is being done now.</blockquote>