Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 4941719" data-attributes="member: 82106">Well, this is an idea to consider. I'm not really sure why archer rangers should be especially favored in this way, but maybe you can elaborate at some point (perhaps it should go its own thread...).Ouch! those poor rangers! I guess they'll die. lol. Fighters are Controllers (yeah yeah, its called defender, now try to actually figure out what the difference is in any practical sense, HINT: there is no martial controller class). Except multi-targetting, while not strictly always limited to controllers, is still mostly a controller function. Thus removing that ability from rangers is in no way stepping on their primary function. And your "effect" solution for Twin Strike is pointless. It doesn't get rid of the stacked static damage bonus issue, which IS the whole issue with TS. I suppose it could be clarified, but lets be full disclosure here, WotC has made it abundantly clear that the intended interpretation of TS is that you designate a target as part of each attack and thus you don't decide the second target until the first attack is resolved. You may not consider that RAW, but basically 99.5% of everyone playing the game appears to believe that is the correct interpretation. It only sounds unclear when you get that last 1/2% that are rules lawyers discussing it on the boards.Anyway, this is getting more or less OT, so I think I'll just leave it at that.</blockquote>

Verification