Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 4950967" data-attributes="member: 71571">I wouldn't change it at all.  The feat is balanced as it is.  It's not like you can go around dual-wielding mordenkrad in one hand and an execution axe in the other.EDIT:It's already been proven that the Dwarf with Mordenkrad and DWT does do less a bit less DPR with a Strength based class than a Strength based class with a Maul and Weapon Focus. Dwarves -need- this feet as is or else the changes you make to the feat will make Dwarven HammerAxeBeards rare unless they're a) Avengers or b) Laser Clerics with a Crusader's hammer or c) Hexhammer.So, Avengers, and ranged spellcasters would get the most mileage out of a feat that is designed for melee attacker dwarves.The feat would not hit its intended target and would not be used as intended except by -one- class.  /EDIT:At -most- I would give the escalating bonus at higher tiers, but other than that, they clearly have said they -made- superior hammers, axes, and spears with full knowledge of these feats.  They didn't go 'Whoops!  Mordenkrad!' they went 'Alright, we have a huge hammer for dwarves to use now.'And with the addition of -other- races getting 'Exotic weapon proficiencies (plural) + damage bonus' feats, I think that such a change is out of touch with the direction of design they're intending to go towards.I think such a change is only good for appealing to your aesthetics but has nothing to do with how the game is being designed and balanced, so I suggest you rethink this idea.</blockquote>

Verification