Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Voadam" data-source="post: 3290424" data-attributes="member: 2209">I have AU, the nondeluxe version of AE and I have the PHII.I like the AU's racial class levels and the unfettered swashbuckler class (the best swashbuckler class I've seen) a lot. I'm playing a giant racial class character in a Greyhawk Age of Worms D&D game right now. I used the unfettered as an NPC bad guy in my high level. I was playing a giant warmain in an FR D&D game for a while and he fit in well I thought. I made a celestial littorian werelion for a planar game that never happened.I like the PHII's class variants a lot and the new classes are pretty nifty. I'm playing a beguiler in a Greyhawk Savage Tide game right now. I also play a ranger with the PHII variant in a game right now and played a variant hexblade in a previous game. One of the PCs in my game used to play a knight. Other PCs in games I've played in have played dragon shamans, knights, and duskblades. The dragon shaman's mechanics and flavor seem significantly out of sync though.I never really got into the AU magic system, it is a bunch of new classes with enhanceable spells but everybody knows every spell on their list which I don't like. The variety comes from class lists and feats. I do like how their spellcasting classes stack caster level and slots for multiclassing though.AU and PH both have a bunch of neat feats.AU has neat weapon templates, new exotic weapon types that can be applied to any weapon similar to special materials or masterwork.I could care less about PHII affiliations and mechanics for remaking characters or the character RP advice.</blockquote>

Verification