Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="nightwyrm" data-source="post: 4723861" data-attributes="member: 75542">But I like my druid turning into a bear and ripping off some dude's head. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Essentially, isn't this the problem?&nbsp; 3E druid was so broad and did so many things that people starts to think that all those abilities were intrinsic to being a druid.&nbsp; When they split the druid up into class A, B and C for 4e, they can only call one of those classes &quot;druid&quot;.&nbsp; No matter which class you give the druid name to, there'll always be people who thinks the other two classes contains abilities that should be intrinsic to a class called the &quot;druid&quot;.&nbsp; Heck, if you really look at it, the entire primal power source consists of 3/4 druid and 1/4 barbarian.&nbsp; Yeah, that's right, the 3e druid was so broad that they could almost make a power source entirely from that class.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="nightwyrm, post: 4723861, member: 75542"] But I like my druid turning into a bear and ripping off some dude's head. :D Essentially, isn't this the problem? 3E druid was so broad and did so many things that people starts to think that all those abilities were intrinsic to being a druid. When they split the druid up into class A, B and C for 4e, they can only call one of those classes "druid". No matter which class you give the druid name to, there'll always be people who thinks the other two classes contains abilities that should be intrinsic to a class called the "druid". Heck, if you really look at it, the entire primal power source consists of 3/4 druid and 1/4 barbarian. Yeah, that's right, the 3e druid was so broad that they could almost make a power source entirely from that class. [/QUOTE]

Verification