Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Philosophical question: Do games become "obsolete"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Odhanan" data-source="post: 2694260" data-attributes="member: 12324"><p>If obsolete is "outmoded", then yes, games do become obsolete. That's just not what I understood by the quote. The quote makes a comparison between technology and games, and there I find this is the idea of progress, or "better games replacing bad ones" that is targeted. </p><p></p><p>This is where I agree with the quote. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Fundamentally, what changed in RPGs over 30 years? What objectively improved over the logic of OD&D?</p><p></p><p>Role-playing immersion? The co-authors of D&D were already advocates of immersion and role-playing instead of roll-playing.</p><p></p><p>Adding skills to the game? Players of OD&D are/were using the stats for it. Fundamentally there's no improvement here: this is still a die roll under/over a number picturing a related affinity of the character.</p><p></p><p>Less Saves? Then whichever is good, more stats (adding skills) or less stats (reducing the number of saves)? </p><p></p><p>What RPG did fundamentally improve the way RPGs were conceived prior to their publication and why, objectively? I do have opinions about which game variations I like and why. What this or that game brought to the way RPGs are conceived. But none of these opinions is a critera to demonstrate an objective technological improvement. </p><p></p><p>The fact that people disagree and debate on nearly all matters of RPG design points out to me that RPGs don't become technologically and inherently obsolete. Some <strong>people consider</strong> them obsolete because they are outmoded, and this fulfills our definition #2 in this thread. But some people still play outmoded games and find them good/entertaining/satisfying for whatever they are searching for by gaming. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I can't agree with this. Doesn't matter the number of people still playing a game: look at diaglo for instance: He plays OD&D, doesn't he? So the game is still in use, even if that's a half dozen guys judged "deluded" by the majority of gamers. Some people still play RIFTS, or RuneQuest, or the old Talislanta, or whatever games we can think of, unless maybe if they were, from the very start, fatally flawed in their design.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Odhanan, post: 2694260, member: 12324"] If obsolete is "outmoded", then yes, games do become obsolete. That's just not what I understood by the quote. The quote makes a comparison between technology and games, and there I find this is the idea of progress, or "better games replacing bad ones" that is targeted. This is where I agree with the quote. Fundamentally, what changed in RPGs over 30 years? What objectively improved over the logic of OD&D? Role-playing immersion? The co-authors of D&D were already advocates of immersion and role-playing instead of roll-playing. Adding skills to the game? Players of OD&D are/were using the stats for it. Fundamentally there's no improvement here: this is still a die roll under/over a number picturing a related affinity of the character. Less Saves? Then whichever is good, more stats (adding skills) or less stats (reducing the number of saves)? What RPG did fundamentally improve the way RPGs were conceived prior to their publication and why, objectively? I do have opinions about which game variations I like and why. What this or that game brought to the way RPGs are conceived. But none of these opinions is a critera to demonstrate an objective technological improvement. The fact that people disagree and debate on nearly all matters of RPG design points out to me that RPGs don't become technologically and inherently obsolete. Some [b]people consider[/b] them obsolete because they are outmoded, and this fulfills our definition #2 in this thread. But some people still play outmoded games and find them good/entertaining/satisfying for whatever they are searching for by gaming. I can't agree with this. Doesn't matter the number of people still playing a game: look at diaglo for instance: He plays OD&D, doesn't he? So the game is still in use, even if that's a half dozen guys judged "deluded" by the majority of gamers. Some people still play RIFTS, or RuneQuest, or the old Talislanta, or whatever games we can think of, unless maybe if they were, from the very start, fatally flawed in their design. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Philosophical question: Do games become "obsolete"?
Top