Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Philosophical thread of the week: Could robots be conscious?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cheiromancer" data-source="post: 2763686" data-attributes="member: 141"><p>Well, the definition at <a href="http://Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal/" target="_blank">Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</a> defines determinism as "given a specified way things are at a time <em>t</em>, the way things go thereafter is fixed as a matter of natural law." But it points out that Laplace and Popper both expressed determinism in terms of predictability. That may have been where your profs were coming from. The notions are separable, but are also easy (and often useful) to commingle. It's also easy (although less useful) to see determinism as entailing fatalism, but they are distinguishable too.</p><p></p><p>Anyways, I don't want to go too far off topic. I think that since computers share the same physical nature as we do, then if we are conscious and exhibit free will, the same could be true of computers. And if it is only an illusion on our part, then computers can suffer from the same illusion. To cover my bases, I sometimes talk about "the experience of free will". Perhaps the computer chips that those computers use will be so small that quantum effects will render their precise operation unpredictable- I don't think this kind of unpredictability is required for them to be free or conscious, but I'm willing to grant that future computers might well be inherently unpredictable.</p><p></p><p>I'll grant the point, but I really don't think there is a contradiction between being predictable and being free. In fact, the reason why societies employ a system of reward, punishment and persuasion to control behavior is the thesis that free beings are predictable. If you could not predict that people would seek rewards, avoid punishment and live their lives according to rational principles, then a society of free beings would be impossible. People who egregiously flout the social code are judged to be insane, or at least suffering from a compulsion that has diminished their freedom.</p><p></p><p>Or take the case of when a commitment is freely undertaken. Marital fidelity, say. Your behavior in respect to that commitment should be utterly predictable in the future, but I would regard marital fidelity as a continuous exercise in freedom, not a diminishment of it.</p><p></p><p>Anyways, I think there is an intimate connection between consciousness and freedom. Between having experiences and having the experience of free will. If a system is capable of both perception and action, then the kind of modeling of the world necessary to have phenomenal consciousness is of the same order of complexity as the kind of causal modeling of the world necessary to have the experience of free will.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cheiromancer, post: 2763686, member: 141"] Well, the definition at [URL=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal/]Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy[/URL] defines determinism as "given a specified way things are at a time [i]t[/i], the way things go thereafter is fixed as a matter of natural law." But it points out that Laplace and Popper both expressed determinism in terms of predictability. That may have been where your profs were coming from. The notions are separable, but are also easy (and often useful) to commingle. It's also easy (although less useful) to see determinism as entailing fatalism, but they are distinguishable too. Anyways, I don't want to go too far off topic. I think that since computers share the same physical nature as we do, then if we are conscious and exhibit free will, the same could be true of computers. And if it is only an illusion on our part, then computers can suffer from the same illusion. To cover my bases, I sometimes talk about "the experience of free will". Perhaps the computer chips that those computers use will be so small that quantum effects will render their precise operation unpredictable- I don't think this kind of unpredictability is required for them to be free or conscious, but I'm willing to grant that future computers might well be inherently unpredictable. I'll grant the point, but I really don't think there is a contradiction between being predictable and being free. In fact, the reason why societies employ a system of reward, punishment and persuasion to control behavior is the thesis that free beings are predictable. If you could not predict that people would seek rewards, avoid punishment and live their lives according to rational principles, then a society of free beings would be impossible. People who egregiously flout the social code are judged to be insane, or at least suffering from a compulsion that has diminished their freedom. Or take the case of when a commitment is freely undertaken. Marital fidelity, say. Your behavior in respect to that commitment should be utterly predictable in the future, but I would regard marital fidelity as a continuous exercise in freedom, not a diminishment of it. Anyways, I think there is an intimate connection between consciousness and freedom. Between having experiences and having the experience of free will. If a system is capable of both perception and action, then the kind of modeling of the world necessary to have phenomenal consciousness is of the same order of complexity as the kind of causal modeling of the world necessary to have the experience of free will. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Philosophical thread of the week: Could robots be conscious?
Top