Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Philosophy behind Intelligent Blademaster feat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bganon" data-source="post: 4637890" data-attributes="member: 60886"><p>I think the philosophy behind Intelligent Blademaster is just this:</p><p></p><p>The swordmage is supposed to fill the "defender" role, but there is no (intended) swordmage build with Str as a primary stat.</p><p></p><p>I think the reason you -don't- see an equivalent feat for Paladins is that a Str-based Paladin is meant to be a perfectly viable build (whether it's as good as a Cha-based Paladin is another debate). Even for clerics and warlords, which aren't defenders anyway, there are still builds that have Str as the primary stat (warlords are supposed to -all- have Str primary). So these other classes are intended to have perfectly viable builds with good BMAs. The swordmage is special, though: Str is -never- primary for them but they're supposed to be defenders, and I think good BMAs (and OAs) are seen as an important piece of the defender role.</p><p></p><p>Why they chose to do it with a feat rather than a class feature, I have no idea. They already sort of implemented it in quite a few swordmage powers anyway, so I'm not sure how good the feat really is. But I can understand why there's no equivalent for Cha-based paladins or Wis-based clerics --- if you're one of those two classes and want good BMAs, there's already a Str-based build available for you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bganon, post: 4637890, member: 60886"] I think the philosophy behind Intelligent Blademaster is just this: The swordmage is supposed to fill the "defender" role, but there is no (intended) swordmage build with Str as a primary stat. I think the reason you -don't- see an equivalent feat for Paladins is that a Str-based Paladin is meant to be a perfectly viable build (whether it's as good as a Cha-based Paladin is another debate). Even for clerics and warlords, which aren't defenders anyway, there are still builds that have Str as the primary stat (warlords are supposed to -all- have Str primary). So these other classes are intended to have perfectly viable builds with good BMAs. The swordmage is special, though: Str is -never- primary for them but they're supposed to be defenders, and I think good BMAs (and OAs) are seen as an important piece of the defender role. Why they chose to do it with a feat rather than a class feature, I have no idea. They already sort of implemented it in quite a few swordmage powers anyway, so I'm not sure how good the feat really is. But I can understand why there's no equivalent for Cha-based paladins or Wis-based clerics --- if you're one of those two classes and want good BMAs, there's already a Str-based build available for you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Philosophy behind Intelligent Blademaster feat
Top