Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Picard Season 3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8990336" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>There wasn't a working version, that's correct.</p><p></p><p>After Challenger they considered it as one of the potential options, but there was no good way to make it work.</p><p></p><p>As for Section 31, that show needs to DIAF, frankly.</p><p></p><p>It's the opposite of what Star Trek needs at this point. It's the opposite of the tone and point of Star Trek. The only way I could see it working is if it rapidly became about taking down Section 31, once and for all. Unfortunately it seems like a significant minority of the writers are confused as hell and think Section 31 is Starfleet's equivalent of The Culture's "Contact", but it absolutely is not. Contact is much more straightforward and isn't self-interested, nor gleefully evil, whereas Section 31 is absolutely both. Nor does Contact act unless absolutely necessary, and usually not against The Culture itself, but rather external entities interacting with The Culture. Whereas Section 31 continually attempts to manipulate Starfleet and the Federation, even there are no exigent circumstances, and is quite happy to act against Starfleet or the Federation if it's beneficial to Section 31's goals - which seem nebulous at best. On top of all this, Section 31 seems to have a "mad science" division and to continually work on "mad science" stuff as a major part of its work, whereas Contact just does not. Period. Thus in practice Contact is aligned with Starfleet Intelligence, whereas Section 31 is more aligned with the CIA, particularly the CIA at its worst in the 1950s through 1980s. We don't need a show de facto glorifying the goddamn 20th century CIA, that was one of the scummiest intelligence organisations the West has ever produced, which is saying something. We double don't need it at the expense of Star Trek, which hard-opposed those kind of shenanigans.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8990336, member: 18"] There wasn't a working version, that's correct. After Challenger they considered it as one of the potential options, but there was no good way to make it work. As for Section 31, that show needs to DIAF, frankly. It's the opposite of what Star Trek needs at this point. It's the opposite of the tone and point of Star Trek. The only way I could see it working is if it rapidly became about taking down Section 31, once and for all. Unfortunately it seems like a significant minority of the writers are confused as hell and think Section 31 is Starfleet's equivalent of The Culture's "Contact", but it absolutely is not. Contact is much more straightforward and isn't self-interested, nor gleefully evil, whereas Section 31 is absolutely both. Nor does Contact act unless absolutely necessary, and usually not against The Culture itself, but rather external entities interacting with The Culture. Whereas Section 31 continually attempts to manipulate Starfleet and the Federation, even there are no exigent circumstances, and is quite happy to act against Starfleet or the Federation if it's beneficial to Section 31's goals - which seem nebulous at best. On top of all this, Section 31 seems to have a "mad science" division and to continually work on "mad science" stuff as a major part of its work, whereas Contact just does not. Period. Thus in practice Contact is aligned with Starfleet Intelligence, whereas Section 31 is more aligned with the CIA, particularly the CIA at its worst in the 1950s through 1980s. We don't need a show de facto glorifying the goddamn 20th century CIA, that was one of the scummiest intelligence organisations the West has ever produced, which is saying something. We double don't need it at the expense of Star Trek, which hard-opposed those kind of shenanigans. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Picard Season 3
Top