Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ashrym" data-source="post: 7863338" data-attributes="member: 6750235"><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />The thing is, I can understand how people feel about a class they like that gets either omitted or changed to become a part of another class.&nbsp; I wasn't happy when bards were not in 4e's PHB.There were also barbarian, druid, and sorcerer fans unhappy about their favorite class not making the cut.&nbsp; It happens.&nbsp; The difference is the PHB2 came out (the following year IIRC) to include all 4 of those classes fairly early in the system, reversing the omission from the PHB.5e didn't do that with classes people may have wanted and it looks like the warlord might have gone the way of the assassin and cavalier.&nbsp; It might only ever be represented in the battle master.&nbsp; If a person is a big fan of the class as a cleric alternative that sucks.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ashrym, post: 7863338, member: 6750235"] :D The thing is, I can understand how people feel about a class they like that gets either omitted or changed to become a part of another class. I wasn't happy when bards were not in 4e's PHB. There were also barbarian, druid, and sorcerer fans unhappy about their favorite class not making the cut. It happens. The difference is the PHB2 came out (the following year IIRC) to include all 4 of those classes fairly early in the system, reversing the omission from the PHB. 5e didn't do that with classes people may have wanted and it looks like the warlord might have gone the way of the assassin and cavalier. It might only ever be represented in the battle master. If a person is a big fan of the class as a cleric alternative that sucks. [/QUOTE]

Verification