Heh - not to mention they would chafe like you wouldn't believe!I nearly snorted Coke Zero when I saw the picture you posted. As a woman who has worn garters to hold up stockings I can tell you that those thin straps would never hold armor leggings they would break from the weight or hang loosely and be droopy.
I did a quick bit of photoshopping to try to get rid of the boobage in the armor...
![]()
A tin bikini at that.... ow.Ahh well that is different those are mithral garters.
It was just a weird picture to me it was like seeing a woman on the top dressed in a business jacket and blouse and the bottom is a bikini. My roommate's comment was what it's laundry day and her pants are still in the wash.
One of my frustrations over the years has been finding decent minis and pictures of female adventurers.
Sandra Garrity does a decent job of covering the body.It is better now then it used to be. I remember back in the early 80s going nuts trying to find a female wizard who was not half dressed or topless.
Whoops, meant to post this with the other -
![]()
'Mystic Warrior' (definitely not a Jedi) Libby.
More disturbing is Dominatrix Libby....
The Auld Grump
Heh, it was painted as a light saber on their site, until they switched back to showing original sculpts and unpainted minis.well, the sword does kind of look like a light saber.
No comment on dominatrix libby.
If you really wanted realism in armour (as opposed to just coverage) you would probably begin by demanding female warriors wear helmets. Deflections to the heart are of secondary concern when someone is trying to bash in or bisect your head.
Or at least have the helmet ready - tucked under the arm, sitting on the ground while the model is in a relaxed pose....Agreed. If you armor nothing else, you armor the head. Helmet is top priority. Once you've got that, you cover neck, chest and belly. Everything else is of substantially lesser importance.
(I always kind of wonder why artists who want to portray sexy female warriors don't go with Roman legionary armor. It's practical combat gear that also shows a fair bit of skin. But then, I guess the point of cheesecake is to emphasize that the character considers looking sexy to be more important than survival.)
Or at least have the helmet ready - tucked under the arm, sitting on the ground while the model is in a relaxed pose....
But the gut is an even better target than the head- less likely to get out of the way. One slice, and then it's the onion test....
If you really wanted realism in armour (as opposed to just coverage) you would probably begin by demanding female warriors wear helmets. Deflections to the heart are of secondary concern when someone is trying to bash in or bisect your head.