Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Echohawk" data-source="post: 4680150" data-attributes="member: 9849">Well, is there anyone who doesn't think that it would be good for consumers to get both digital and paper copies of a product for the same price? I'd certainly like that, obviously.However, my desire for that to be the case does not mean that I think it is morally okay to assume that that is the case.But in both of these examples, you are trying to simply retain the same rights that you originally had -- the right to watch the movie, and the right to listen to the CD. You are not gaining any additional benefits. So these examples do not work as a counter to the argument I just presented that owning a PDF version of a book provides additional benefits that the purchaser of the book has not paid for.</blockquote>