Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Piracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CharlesRyan" data-source="post: 4681959" data-attributes="member: 5265"><p>It's easy to think that something you can hold has intrinsic value, but is there really that big a difference between the physical and the intangible, in terms of value?</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If physicality confers value, nothing should be more valuable than real estate. And yet we've seen real estate values plummet in the last year. In some places, there's simply no floor--the only thing supporting any price at all is the willingness of speculators to come in and grab the property for a song, on the prospect that it will, someday, again increase in value. Absent such speculators (in other words, absent people who are assigning imaginary value to the property), the property is literally unsellable at almost any price.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Look at the car lots--especially those packed with Hummers. Big, physical items. The dealerships practically can't give them away.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Consider the fully-recyclable plastic packaging I throw away because my council won't take it in the recycling bin. Why not? Because there's insufficient market for recycled plastic. It has value in the sense that it's useful, but nobody wants it. So, in a monetary sense, it has no value.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">What about services? Do they have less inherent value than goods, simply because they can't be weighed or measured?</li> </ul><p></p><p>I think recent events in the economy really do illustrate that physicality does not equal inherent value. (Just ask anybody currently paying a mortgage that's twice what their house is currently worth.) Some of my points above might be slightly exaggerated for effect, but my broader point is that you can't really assess IP value properly if you cling to the idea that physical objects somehow have "real" value that intangible properties do not.</p><p></p><p>At the end of the day, every single thing is worth exactly what people are willing to pay for it. That's the only definition of monetary value, and the subject's physical or nonphysical nature have absolutely nothing to do with it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CharlesRyan, post: 4681959, member: 5265"] It's easy to think that something you can hold has intrinsic value, but is there really that big a difference between the physical and the intangible, in terms of value? [LIST] [*]If physicality confers value, nothing should be more valuable than real estate. And yet we've seen real estate values plummet in the last year. In some places, there's simply no floor--the only thing supporting any price at all is the willingness of speculators to come in and grab the property for a song, on the prospect that it will, someday, again increase in value. Absent such speculators (in other words, absent people who are assigning imaginary value to the property), the property is literally unsellable at almost any price. [*]Look at the car lots--especially those packed with Hummers. Big, physical items. The dealerships practically can't give them away. [*]Consider the fully-recyclable plastic packaging I throw away because my council won't take it in the recycling bin. Why not? Because there's insufficient market for recycled plastic. It has value in the sense that it's useful, but nobody wants it. So, in a monetary sense, it has no value. [*]What about services? Do they have less inherent value than goods, simply because they can't be weighed or measured? [/LIST] I think recent events in the economy really do illustrate that physicality does not equal inherent value. (Just ask anybody currently paying a mortgage that's twice what their house is currently worth.) Some of my points above might be slightly exaggerated for effect, but my broader point is that you can't really assess IP value properly if you cling to the idea that physical objects somehow have "real" value that intangible properties do not. At the end of the day, every single thing is worth exactly what people are willing to pay for it. That's the only definition of monetary value, and the subject's physical or nonphysical nature have absolutely nothing to do with it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Piracy
Top