Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Trastone" data-source="post: 7751335" data-attributes="member: 6959635">I find it amusing that they simplified naming of options to flavor your class and people are hung up on the term FEAT. If they had called one of them class options, one racial trait(that is a choice at levels), one skill focuses, and renamed Feat to powers most of these comments wouldn’t be here because people are getting hung up on the term feat and applying it around the context of the old feat system. We do not have the rules and do not fully understand them, but it is definitely a new game. They have stated they don’t want the required feat especially with “feat tax levels.” If feats  have any prerequisite feat people will label them as fear tax because they only care about the OP end result. I’m remaining hopeful and optimistic. Much could change as the game is going through a public play test. People whom have played it have given it positive reviews. I like the changes I have seen so far, but getting caught up on the term feat when it is obviously used differently than before is a little silly. We will have to see how the character sheet looks. I’m sure each one of those will have a separate section. If they don’t then I concede that I have misread or misunderstood their intentions.</blockquote>