Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pissed about the reduction of the Spell Focus Feats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ruleslawyer" data-source="post: 954320" data-attributes="member: 1757"><p>This is about the most egregious example of a strawman argument that I've ever seen on these boards. Where the heck did you get from a relatively straightforward post that I think this? Please do not put such words in my mouth.</p><p></p><p>The entire point is that a wizard who <em>doesn't</em> take Spell Penetration shouldn't have all that great a chance of lobbing spells at a <em>spell-resistant</em> foe. The titan's SR is one of its principal defenses. It's a CR 21 monster. If you're a 20th-level wizard without Spell Penetration facing a CR 21 outsider, you'd better be aware that fewer than half the spells you cast are going to get through. That's how the system works. Complaining that wizards have no chance of affecting the titan with direct-damage spells misses the point that, unless you're reasonably optimized (ONE feat! Count it!) to deal with an SR creature, you're not supposed to be throwing spells at it. </p><p></p><p>A wizard who doesn't have Spell Focus and Spell Penetration shouldn't be throwing save-or-consequences spells at a titan. The wizard's better off using metamagically-enhanced buffing spells or metamagicked evocation spells (target the titan's weak save AND do damage even on a successful save). And yes, that is how it works. </p><p></p><p>Moreover, wizards have a really nice advantage; <em>they don't need to expose themselves to damage in order to deal it.</em> A wizard faced with a spell resistant creature with good saves and immunities is merely going to find that he's forced to spend more resources to fight it than, say, one or two spells (hardly 20% of the wizard's resources, let alone the party's). Even were the wizard forced to sit out the combat, that would only be comparable to what other classes are faced with in different situations: The rogue vs. undead and constructs, the fighter vs. invisible/ranged attacking creatures or deadly bricks like the remorhaz, colossal monstrous scorpion, or tarrasque; the cleric vs... well, any monster that requires him to spend his actions healing fellow party members.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ruleslawyer, post: 954320, member: 1757"] This is about the most egregious example of a strawman argument that I've ever seen on these boards. Where the heck did you get from a relatively straightforward post that I think this? Please do not put such words in my mouth. The entire point is that a wizard who [i]doesn't[/i] take Spell Penetration shouldn't have all that great a chance of lobbing spells at a [i]spell-resistant[/i] foe. The titan's SR is one of its principal defenses. It's a CR 21 monster. If you're a 20th-level wizard without Spell Penetration facing a CR 21 outsider, you'd better be aware that fewer than half the spells you cast are going to get through. That's how the system works. Complaining that wizards have no chance of affecting the titan with direct-damage spells misses the point that, unless you're reasonably optimized (ONE feat! Count it!) to deal with an SR creature, you're not supposed to be throwing spells at it. A wizard who doesn't have Spell Focus and Spell Penetration shouldn't be throwing save-or-consequences spells at a titan. The wizard's better off using metamagically-enhanced buffing spells or metamagicked evocation spells (target the titan's weak save AND do damage even on a successful save). And yes, that is how it works. Moreover, wizards have a really nice advantage; [i]they don't need to expose themselves to damage in order to deal it.[/i] A wizard faced with a spell resistant creature with good saves and immunities is merely going to find that he's forced to spend more resources to fight it than, say, one or two spells (hardly 20% of the wizard's resources, let alone the party's). Even were the wizard forced to sit out the combat, that would only be comparable to what other classes are faced with in different situations: The rogue vs. undead and constructs, the fighter vs. invisible/ranged attacking creatures or deadly bricks like the remorhaz, colossal monstrous scorpion, or tarrasque; the cleric vs... well, any monster that requires him to spend his actions healing fellow party members. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Pissed about the reduction of the Spell Focus Feats
Top