Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Planar Handbook" - completlely useless?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nisarg" data-source="post: 1716688" data-attributes="member: 19893"><p>It isn't slander, it is a logical conclusion of your line of thought. I've explained it at least twice on this thread already but for your benefit i will do so again.</p><p></p><p>It is UNNESCESSARY for any PS fan to have to explicitly demand that PS be brought back at the expense of the current setting, because it is implicitly AN INEVITABLE CONSEQUENCE that if PS was brought back it would be at the expense of the current setting.</p><p></p><p>Do you understand?</p><p>To say "sure we want PS to become the "default" setting but that doesn't mean we want to force it on anyone or make them stop producing the other planes stuff" is an absurdity, it is like saying "sure we want the Yes side to win the referendum, but we don't want the No side to lose". It really doesn't matter whether you want it or not, "berk", if you win, all the non-PS fans lose.</p><p></p><p>You can't have both. To want PS to be "the" planar line (and there is no other way for Wotc to do it: Wizards cannot afford to have TWO planar lines), is to DE FACTO want PS to be the ONLY planar line.</p><p></p><p>Do you get that now?</p><p>I don't need to show you any website with a PS fan talking about how much he wants to take away the current Planar setting from its fans, the mere fact that he wants PS to be the official WoTC setting, or published at all, is enough to mean that DE FACTO that is what he wants to see happening.</p><p></p><p>Some people here on Enworld had proposed that Wizards could just make a single one-shot hardcover, or give PS to a third party. Wizards can't really afford to do either: </p><p>1. Doing a one-shot would lead to unimaginable confusion among the fans. Fans will be wondering why all of a sudden there are all these elements in the planes that weren't in the previous books, and they'll be wondering why these aren't in the future books. You'll essentially be creating two canons that serves no purpose other than to placate a tiny group of hardcore fanboys.</p><p>2. Contracting out the license would be even worse because then you'd have someone directly competing with Wizards for what is very close to the same setting. Currently other companies do Planar books but none of them are allowed to use sigil, the great wheel, etc etc. If Wizards contracted it out, then they'd have another company directly using the same setting in competition with Wizard's own books. The only reason Wizards might want to do this is if they were to stop making books on the Planes altogether, which would bring us back to the DE FACTO exclusion of all non-PS fans.</p><p></p><p>Nisarg</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nisarg, post: 1716688, member: 19893"] It isn't slander, it is a logical conclusion of your line of thought. I've explained it at least twice on this thread already but for your benefit i will do so again. It is UNNESCESSARY for any PS fan to have to explicitly demand that PS be brought back at the expense of the current setting, because it is implicitly AN INEVITABLE CONSEQUENCE that if PS was brought back it would be at the expense of the current setting. Do you understand? To say "sure we want PS to become the "default" setting but that doesn't mean we want to force it on anyone or make them stop producing the other planes stuff" is an absurdity, it is like saying "sure we want the Yes side to win the referendum, but we don't want the No side to lose". It really doesn't matter whether you want it or not, "berk", if you win, all the non-PS fans lose. You can't have both. To want PS to be "the" planar line (and there is no other way for Wotc to do it: Wizards cannot afford to have TWO planar lines), is to DE FACTO want PS to be the ONLY planar line. Do you get that now? I don't need to show you any website with a PS fan talking about how much he wants to take away the current Planar setting from its fans, the mere fact that he wants PS to be the official WoTC setting, or published at all, is enough to mean that DE FACTO that is what he wants to see happening. Some people here on Enworld had proposed that Wizards could just make a single one-shot hardcover, or give PS to a third party. Wizards can't really afford to do either: 1. Doing a one-shot would lead to unimaginable confusion among the fans. Fans will be wondering why all of a sudden there are all these elements in the planes that weren't in the previous books, and they'll be wondering why these aren't in the future books. You'll essentially be creating two canons that serves no purpose other than to placate a tiny group of hardcore fanboys. 2. Contracting out the license would be even worse because then you'd have someone directly competing with Wizards for what is very close to the same setting. Currently other companies do Planar books but none of them are allowed to use sigil, the great wheel, etc etc. If Wizards contracted it out, then they'd have another company directly using the same setting in competition with Wizard's own books. The only reason Wizards might want to do this is if they were to stop making books on the Planes altogether, which would bring us back to the DE FACTO exclusion of all non-PS fans. Nisarg [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Planar Handbook" - completlely useless?
Top