Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Reynard" data-source="post: 9128431" data-attributes="member: 467">ETA: The following is complete nonsense, based on a bad assumption (64 page books in the new set) and faulty memory (that 2E pages were more word dense than 5E pages). Completely wrong. I will own that.Note that I say this as someone who never particularly liked Planescape:WotC is pretty much guaranteed to be unable to do it justice based simply on the format. It is going to be necessarily shallow given the page count it has and how those pages are going to be distributed. This is known.But here's the thing: I don't think people will care. If the success of 5E has shown us anything, it is that the current fanbase is not especially interested in deep lore or extensive libraries of supplements. it is working for them. We really can't expect it to change.</blockquote>