Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Play Is Paramount: Discuss
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 9897108" data-attributes="member: 6785785"><p>Because that's what RPGs are... people playing around a table (physical or virtual). People engaging with RPGs in ways that don't consider how things go at the table, while perfectly fine, are of less importance. Play is paramount in importance. </p><p></p><p>Just like all the examples that have been provided of people enjoying something in a way other than intended. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>One of my major milestones as a GM was when a campaign that I'd spent tons of effort on just didn't really get a chance to get going because of two of my players. I spent a stupid amount of time preparing the campaign... NPCs and backstory and all kinds of other things. The PCs were intricately tied into the campaign in ways that I worked with each player to establish.</p><p></p><p>This was for a game my group was playing twice a week. I had three players that could make both games, and then one that could only make one game, and a fifth who could only make the other. I saw this as an interesting opportunity to do something interesting, so we created two sets of PCs... one group for each weekly session. Everyone was on board, so I ran with it. This effectively doubled a lot of the effort I was putting in as I had two sets of locations and characters to detail, and also had to have the two games connect in some ways. So I set all this up... just hours and hours of effort. </p><p></p><p>And it lasted maybe 6 sessions. One player was just eternally dissatisfied with his character so we kept making new ones. He was only in one of the games, so I thought we could accommodate it. One player that was in both groups didn't enjoy one of the groups of characters as much as the other, so he was pushing to just play one group. Basically, trying to accommodate all of this on top of all the prep and everything else... it was just too much. I ended the campaign. </p><p></p><p>Afterward, I looked at the amount of prep I had done... the amount I had read, the books I'd purchased, the amount of writing I did... and all that time was essentially lost. Did I enjoy all that prep in some way? Yes... but only because I was expecting for it to be used in play. I would not have done all of that had I known that it would never really get going. </p><p></p><p>This was my last straw with Pathfinder and the D&D 3.X system, too... and is one of the things that led to me trying to find games where this kind of thing would be less likely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hawkeyefan, post: 9897108, member: 6785785"] Because that's what RPGs are... people playing around a table (physical or virtual). People engaging with RPGs in ways that don't consider how things go at the table, while perfectly fine, are of less importance. Play is paramount in importance. Just like all the examples that have been provided of people enjoying something in a way other than intended. One of my major milestones as a GM was when a campaign that I'd spent tons of effort on just didn't really get a chance to get going because of two of my players. I spent a stupid amount of time preparing the campaign... NPCs and backstory and all kinds of other things. The PCs were intricately tied into the campaign in ways that I worked with each player to establish. This was for a game my group was playing twice a week. I had three players that could make both games, and then one that could only make one game, and a fifth who could only make the other. I saw this as an interesting opportunity to do something interesting, so we created two sets of PCs... one group for each weekly session. Everyone was on board, so I ran with it. This effectively doubled a lot of the effort I was putting in as I had two sets of locations and characters to detail, and also had to have the two games connect in some ways. So I set all this up... just hours and hours of effort. And it lasted maybe 6 sessions. One player was just eternally dissatisfied with his character so we kept making new ones. He was only in one of the games, so I thought we could accommodate it. One player that was in both groups didn't enjoy one of the groups of characters as much as the other, so he was pushing to just play one group. Basically, trying to accommodate all of this on top of all the prep and everything else... it was just too much. I ended the campaign. Afterward, I looked at the amount of prep I had done... the amount I had read, the books I'd purchased, the amount of writing I did... and all that time was essentially lost. Did I enjoy all that prep in some way? Yes... but only because I was expecting for it to be used in play. I would not have done all of that had I known that it would never really get going. This was my last straw with Pathfinder and the D&D 3.X system, too... and is one of the things that led to me trying to find games where this kind of thing would be less likely. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Play Is Paramount: Discuss
Top