Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Player Dilemma
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="genshou" data-source="post: 2554162" data-attributes="member: 13164"><p>I have read these threads in the past. The crux of the matter is that D&D is a world of Absolutism–Good (or [Good] if you prefer) is not a universal principle, it is an absolute. But as I explain in my last post above to <strong>Lord Pendragon</strong>, the absolute of "Good" and what a society or religious grouping perceives as "Good" can differ due to imperfections in human thought. The paladin's goal is to strive for that which is more Lawful Good than anyone else's Lawful Good–the absolute that is the very essence of the alignment. While you or I might be *mostly* Lawful Good but have a few vices, a paladin is striving for perfection.</p><p></p><p>Sepulchrave handled this nicely in his Tales of Wyre campaign with the schism in Oronthon's church between the advocates of mercy (Good) and justice (Law). This seems to be a paradox in real-world Christianity as well, though there are ways to explain how the two balance one another within the context of a being possessing Divine Nature. However, explanation of this would not only cause real-world, irrelevant-to-the-discussion religion to intrude upon the discussion at hand, but would use the very dogmatic approach I shun in my post to <strong>Lord Pendragon</strong> above. Thus, I shall set aside this concept for the purpose of the discussion at hand.</p><p></p><p>A paladin is not required to be perfect; any philosopher who believes in the possibility of a perfect man (and by man I mean human, mortal, sentient) is a fool. As only Oronthon himself in Sepulchrave's campaign possesses the perfection required to balance between Law and Good, any paladin serving under Him must sit on one side of the fence or the other. Thus, the individual's dogma–and therefore their interpretation of moral absolutes–is defined solely by the realm of the Lawful Good alignment in which they reside. It is not so much a question of "is it merciful to the goblin children" or "is it just?", but instead a question of how the needs of both spheres are met, and which side the paladin shies toward.</p><p></p><p>I challenge someone to take what I just wrote and use the mystical powers of brevity to make it half its current size.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="genshou, post: 2554162, member: 13164"] I have read these threads in the past. The crux of the matter is that D&D is a world of Absolutism–Good (or [Good] if you prefer) is not a universal principle, it is an absolute. But as I explain in my last post above to [B]Lord Pendragon[/B], the absolute of "Good" and what a society or religious grouping perceives as "Good" can differ due to imperfections in human thought. The paladin's goal is to strive for that which is more Lawful Good than anyone else's Lawful Good–the absolute that is the very essence of the alignment. While you or I might be *mostly* Lawful Good but have a few vices, a paladin is striving for perfection. Sepulchrave handled this nicely in his Tales of Wyre campaign with the schism in Oronthon's church between the advocates of mercy (Good) and justice (Law). This seems to be a paradox in real-world Christianity as well, though there are ways to explain how the two balance one another within the context of a being possessing Divine Nature. However, explanation of this would not only cause real-world, irrelevant-to-the-discussion religion to intrude upon the discussion at hand, but would use the very dogmatic approach I shun in my post to [B]Lord Pendragon[/B] above. Thus, I shall set aside this concept for the purpose of the discussion at hand. A paladin is not required to be perfect; any philosopher who believes in the possibility of a perfect man (and by man I mean human, mortal, sentient) is a fool. As only Oronthon himself in Sepulchrave's campaign possesses the perfection required to balance between Law and Good, any paladin serving under Him must sit on one side of the fence or the other. Thus, the individual's dogma–and therefore their interpretation of moral absolutes–is defined solely by the realm of the Lawful Good alignment in which they reside. It is not so much a question of "is it merciful to the goblin children" or "is it just?", but instead a question of how the needs of both spheres are met, and which side the paladin shies toward. I challenge someone to take what I just wrote and use the mystical powers of brevity to make it half its current size. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Player Dilemma
Top