Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Player-driven campaigns and developing strong stories
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 8974076" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>'Fallacy', ROFL! Who role plays the characters? Who constructs their personalities and decides how they react to various situations, and probably (in my play at least) determines what sorts of situations those are? The PLAYERS. Characters aren't 'driving' anything, they're played by the players! This entire notion is strange and incomprehensible to me!</p><p></p><p>Maybe the players have no interest in the 'GM driven game' either! Maybe they have no interest in picking from a menu of which bounties to hunt, etc. Maybe the player wants to explore just exactly what it means to decide that his character is angry enough to kill, or if he will betray his friends to get what he wants.</p><p></p><p>Players do the playing, not characters. The wants and desires of the characters, their personalities, etc. are FICTION, part of the state of the world that the players shape and act within. Providing both constraints and material with which to act.</p><p></p><p>I disagree. I mean, not with all of what you have said here, but with some of it. I may also agree with another part. That is, I don't think the players DO need that much from the GM, except to be a sort of organizing influence in terms of pace, setting, and the behavior of NPCs. However, they DO need, or at least can very much profit from, a good set of rules which supports what they're doing. Again, look at the rules for Dungeon World, which offer a very comprehensive set of elements, organized in a sort of 'onion-like' way (Vince Baker observed this about AW, not me). At the core is "RPG as conversation" and then there are the agenda, principles, and specifics of character, and finally the moves and other mechanics. You can strip away elements even, but this is a very thoroughly designed and explicated rules structure which, if played with integrity (IE as instructed) will produce dramatic, thematic, narrative role play. Sure, you CAN do without it, but WHY? It is QUITE useful! Finally, I agree it is great to see, and participate in. I'm not sure I'd use the term 'lean back', because IME the GM has a fairly active part to play.</p><p></p><p>Nobody can or wants to FORCE anyone to do anything. Do you FORCE players to do stuff in your games? Of course not, they come to the table and play, of their own free will. You CAN however kill the sort of play I'm talking about! Heck, its quite easy, as most players are not really aware of what different sorts of games are like, unless they have some experience. If I take 5 naive players and we play trad D&D through some pre-written module, how would they know there's anything else? I mean, that's fine, but if I show them a strongly narrative game, they're equally going to build their understanding on that basis and be just as likely to be entertained that way.</p><p></p><p>I'm not so sure about this. I mean, its not up to me to tell you what your preferences are, but IME narrative play is not THAT different from trad play. Most of what you are doing is describing what your character does, and seeing what happens. At various junctures there are likely to be 'story determining' bits where the players interject some direction into play. Exactly what those are and how they happen varies a lot from game to game. In Dungeon World the GM is bound to ask questions, and use the answers, and there are certain mechanics which let the players ask specific questions that MUST be answered by the GM, which often binds the participants to some new fiction. In Blades in the Dark there's a whole set of game 'phases' where different activities happen. During a score the players mostly just RP in character. The GM may ask questions, but generally the thematics and whatnot are already decided for that session. Those decisions are most likely to happen in 'down time' or 'info gathering' phases of the game where the players decide what sort of score they are doing, and in the process likely propose some fiction (IE "we are pretty sure that the Billhooks are moving some contraband tonight, maybe we can rob them.") It never, IME, feels like 'creating a screenplay'. Again, I'm not in charge of what you decide to like, but your descriptions don't match well with my experiences.</p><p></p><p>Well, this isn't the sort of statement that, IMHO, leads to any conclusion about anything. Sure, ANY sort of play MIGHT possibly arise out of almost any RPG. That's a pretty banal statement if you ask me. I mean, if I take what you tell me at face value, then all the discussion, as well as all my experience and expertise in different types of play is basically just nuthin about nuthin. lol. Color me unconvinced.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 8974076, member: 82106"] 'Fallacy', ROFL! Who role plays the characters? Who constructs their personalities and decides how they react to various situations, and probably (in my play at least) determines what sorts of situations those are? The PLAYERS. Characters aren't 'driving' anything, they're played by the players! This entire notion is strange and incomprehensible to me! Maybe the players have no interest in the 'GM driven game' either! Maybe they have no interest in picking from a menu of which bounties to hunt, etc. Maybe the player wants to explore just exactly what it means to decide that his character is angry enough to kill, or if he will betray his friends to get what he wants. Players do the playing, not characters. The wants and desires of the characters, their personalities, etc. are FICTION, part of the state of the world that the players shape and act within. Providing both constraints and material with which to act. I disagree. I mean, not with all of what you have said here, but with some of it. I may also agree with another part. That is, I don't think the players DO need that much from the GM, except to be a sort of organizing influence in terms of pace, setting, and the behavior of NPCs. However, they DO need, or at least can very much profit from, a good set of rules which supports what they're doing. Again, look at the rules for Dungeon World, which offer a very comprehensive set of elements, organized in a sort of 'onion-like' way (Vince Baker observed this about AW, not me). At the core is "RPG as conversation" and then there are the agenda, principles, and specifics of character, and finally the moves and other mechanics. You can strip away elements even, but this is a very thoroughly designed and explicated rules structure which, if played with integrity (IE as instructed) will produce dramatic, thematic, narrative role play. Sure, you CAN do without it, but WHY? It is QUITE useful! Finally, I agree it is great to see, and participate in. I'm not sure I'd use the term 'lean back', because IME the GM has a fairly active part to play. Nobody can or wants to FORCE anyone to do anything. Do you FORCE players to do stuff in your games? Of course not, they come to the table and play, of their own free will. You CAN however kill the sort of play I'm talking about! Heck, its quite easy, as most players are not really aware of what different sorts of games are like, unless they have some experience. If I take 5 naive players and we play trad D&D through some pre-written module, how would they know there's anything else? I mean, that's fine, but if I show them a strongly narrative game, they're equally going to build their understanding on that basis and be just as likely to be entertained that way. I'm not so sure about this. I mean, its not up to me to tell you what your preferences are, but IME narrative play is not THAT different from trad play. Most of what you are doing is describing what your character does, and seeing what happens. At various junctures there are likely to be 'story determining' bits where the players interject some direction into play. Exactly what those are and how they happen varies a lot from game to game. In Dungeon World the GM is bound to ask questions, and use the answers, and there are certain mechanics which let the players ask specific questions that MUST be answered by the GM, which often binds the participants to some new fiction. In Blades in the Dark there's a whole set of game 'phases' where different activities happen. During a score the players mostly just RP in character. The GM may ask questions, but generally the thematics and whatnot are already decided for that session. Those decisions are most likely to happen in 'down time' or 'info gathering' phases of the game where the players decide what sort of score they are doing, and in the process likely propose some fiction (IE "we are pretty sure that the Billhooks are moving some contraband tonight, maybe we can rob them.") It never, IME, feels like 'creating a screenplay'. Again, I'm not in charge of what you decide to like, but your descriptions don't match well with my experiences. Well, this isn't the sort of statement that, IMHO, leads to any conclusion about anything. Sure, ANY sort of play MIGHT possibly arise out of almost any RPG. That's a pretty banal statement if you ask me. I mean, if I take what you tell me at face value, then all the discussion, as well as all my experience and expertise in different types of play is basically just nuthin about nuthin. lol. Color me unconvinced. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Player-driven campaigns and developing strong stories
Top