Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="lazarus1020" data-source="post: 3451894" data-attributes="member: 51085">I agree with robberbaron and would place myself in the &quot;consider&quot; DM group.&nbsp; I don't think sam500 got the point of my earlier post.&nbsp; I am not opposed to a player doing something off the wall.&nbsp; I had an Assassin character pour all of his poisons onto himself and then let a giant toad eat him.&nbsp; If I was gonna be a rule lawyer I would have said no because the poison was mostly injected not ingestible.I also don't have a problem with players trying to take over the game because I ran a fair game for all the players.&nbsp; I think the rules provide consistentcy and that is what I truely value about the rules.&nbsp; If the players come up with some funny, clever idea to defeat to BBG I will listen to it but I am not gonna say yeah just because it was good for the story.&nbsp; I think the idea of &quot; consider yes&quot; has its' merit, but should be more moderate like just &quot;consider&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="lazarus1020, post: 3451894, member: 51085"] I agree with robberbaron and would place myself in the "consider" DM group. I don't think sam500 got the point of my earlier post. I am not opposed to a player doing something off the wall. I had an Assassin character pour all of his poisons onto himself and then let a giant toad eat him. If I was gonna be a rule lawyer I would have said no because the poison was mostly injected not ingestible. I also don't have a problem with players trying to take over the game because I ran a fair game for all the players. I think the rules provide consistentcy and that is what I truely value about the rules. If the players come up with some funny, clever idea to defeat to BBG I will listen to it but I am not gonna say yeah just because it was good for the story. I think the idea of " consider yes" has its' merit, but should be more moderate like just "consider". [/QUOTE]

Verification