Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="steeldragons" data-source="post: 6626729" data-attributes="member: 92511">As you wish. I don't see any of your houserules or little tweaks as being necessary because I do not see/have not found any of your &quot;points&quot; to be either true or, if there is potential truth (like #3), problematic.Nope. Not once ever.Obviously not.From what I have read and heard from those who have played it, YES! Which leads me immediately to think, &quot;Why would anyone bother to play, let alone go to the trouble to rewrite, 'utter crap'? Why wouldn't they just play something else?&quot;As I said, if you're having fun doing this, that's valid and carry on. But you really have no right to get defensive, yourself. When you are, deliberately, rewriting the game in ways that I (and apparently others) do not see as problems or feel necessary you can't really get all up in arms when the response is, &quot;This doesn't really seem like a problem or necessary.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="steeldragons, post: 6626729, member: 92511"] As you wish. I don't see any of your houserules or little tweaks as being necessary because I do not see/have not found any of your "points" to be either true or, if there is potential truth (like #3), problematic. Nope. Not once ever. Obviously not. From what I have read and heard from those who have played it, YES! Which leads me immediately to think, "Why would anyone bother to play, let alone go to the trouble to rewrite, 'utter crap'? Why wouldn't they just play something else?" As I said, if you're having fun doing this, that's valid and carry on. But you really have no right to get defensive, yourself. When you are, deliberately, rewriting the game in ways that I (and apparently others) do not see as problems or feel necessary you can't really get all up in arms when the response is, "This doesn't really seem like a problem or necessary." [/QUOTE]

Verification