Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Guest 6801328" data-source="post: 8060745">If all evidence didn't point to you engaging in an open-minded, sincere way, I would be starting to wonder if maybe you weren't trying to devise trap questions, to which you could then disingenuously pretend to be confused by the answers.  I'm glad that I would never suspect that of you.In any event, you're right: in the example you gave I was jumping to judgment.  I think it was your use of the word "mysteriously", which suggested to me that player was being intentionally dishonest about what he/she was doing, which I think in general qualifies as jerk behavior. But I only know that because you gave me the metagame information, as it were.  As the actual DM in that scenario I might be unaware of what was going on, in which case I might very well be oblivious to it.But let's say the player is not a jerk, and thus is open about reading the module.  I think I'd probably ask why, and start a discussion about what everybody at the table considers fun.  But let's further assume, as odd as it may sound, that this conversation ends with the player still using the module.  Ok, fair enough.  Now that I know that, I just make sure I don't run the module exactly as it's written.  Problem solved.Does that clarify things?</blockquote>