Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 1565980" data-attributes="member: 5890">Nope&nbsp; - because your previous posts are all &quot;3 characters ago, the player created a character that was too powerful, so he's obviously got a playstyle which doesn't match ours&quot;. You're making it a focus of your arguement. Whenever you bring it up I hear &quot;I'm someone who won't forgive or forget&quot;.And since we've heard the badly-supported &quot;character too good&quot; arguement a few times, and only one instance - the latest instance - of him argueing with a ruling, and that in a way that was eithera) immediately after the combat, in the middle of a session - IOW, you were breaking the session to tell them how he failed to make a roll, not him.b) out of the game anyway, and therefore not deleterious to the game.I'm putting together a picture of someone who's out looking for justification. I'm sitting here and I'm seeing a case that's so badly put together that it has to be concealing something. In other words, because of your lack of supporting evidence, your concentration on events which support your case, but appear to me to be less than relevant and your quite fuzzy point, I'm seeing heavy bias. Unsurprisingly, I therefore believe you to be an evasive and deceitful character and someone I cannot agree with.If you want me to agree with you, make a convincing case.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Saeviomagy, post: 1565980, member: 5890"] Nope - because your previous posts are all "3 characters ago, the player created a character that was too powerful, so he's obviously got a playstyle which doesn't match ours". You're making it a focus of your arguement. Whenever you bring it up I hear "I'm someone who won't forgive or forget". And since we've heard the badly-supported "character too good" arguement a few times, and only one instance - the latest instance - of him argueing with a ruling, and that in a way that was either a) immediately after the combat, in the middle of a session - IOW, you were breaking the session to tell them how he failed to make a roll, not him. b) out of the game anyway, and therefore not deleterious to the game. I'm putting together a picture of someone who's out looking for justification. I'm sitting here and I'm seeing a case that's so badly put together that it has to be concealing something. In other words, because of your lack of supporting evidence, your concentration on events which support your case, but appear to me to be less than relevant and your quite fuzzy point, I'm seeing heavy bias. Unsurprisingly, I therefore believe you to be an evasive and deceitful character and someone I cannot agree with. If you want me to agree with you, make a convincing case. [/QUOTE]

Verification