Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 1566567" data-attributes="member: 5890">But the last two are below the power level of the rest of the party, aren't they? Hasn't that been stated by liquidice and agreed to by dragonlancer?If the rules say X, then what's the problem with playing it that way? I'm still waiting for an example of him arguing something that's genuinely disruptive.What does this mean? Does it mean he's silent during non-combat sections? Does it mean that he's disruptive in his roleplaying (ie - attacks and steals from party members, kills random NPC's etc), or does it mean that he's not a method actor?Details? Or is this just an unsupported attack on character?Well, DragonLancer wants one of two thingsa) Genuine impartial recommendations. These require the facts of the caseb) Confirmation of his own views without regard to the facts, and with no intention to do anything other than a pre-defined course of action, which can happily rely on heavily biased information, or no information at all.If he comes here seeking A), and gives incomplete or biased information, then he'll never get what he's here for. If he comes here seeking B), then I have no sympathy for him.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Saeviomagy, post: 1566567, member: 5890"] But the last two are below the power level of the rest of the party, aren't they? Hasn't that been stated by liquidice and agreed to by dragonlancer? If the rules say X, then what's the problem with playing it that way? I'm still waiting for an example of him arguing something that's genuinely disruptive. What does this mean? Does it mean he's silent during non-combat sections? Does it mean that he's disruptive in his roleplaying (ie - attacks and steals from party members, kills random NPC's etc), or does it mean that he's not a method actor? Details? Or is this just an unsupported attack on character? Well, DragonLancer wants one of two things a) Genuine impartial recommendations. These require the facts of the case b) Confirmation of his own views without regard to the facts, and with no intention to do anything other than a pre-defined course of action, which can happily rely on heavily biased information, or no information at all. If he comes here seeking A), and gives incomplete or biased information, then he'll never get what he's here for. If he comes here seeking B), then I have no sympathy for him. [/QUOTE]

Verification