Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Player Skill" versus DM Ingenuity as a playstyle.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wolfpack48" data-source="post: 9347944" data-attributes="member: 6872648"><p>It’s really about how cleverly you operate the rules. I would never tell players they need a 9 to hit. Or that they need a 12 to disarm the trap. Or they need 12 damage to kill the monster. That's not immersive. They could eventually deduce those things after repeated attempts (if they really want to) but they aren’t told those things outright.</p><p></p><p>The goal isn’t to reproduce a video game but rather replicate the tension you might experience if you were to actually encounter these things.</p><p></p><p>But to be clear, all this isn't what I'm talking about when I mean challenge. I mean in-game challenges to the characters like the monsters themselves, traps, puzzles, mysteries that require player's head to help solve. Things like hiding the system ("roll a 12 to hit," "you take 7 hit points damage") are more to do with immersion than challenge.</p><p></p><p>Look at these two scenarios, though, for how mystery and tension can be added to standard monsters:</p><p></p><p>Scenario 1:</p><p>Player: I attack the orc</p><p>DM: Ok, roll, you need a 12.</p><p>Player: I roll a 15.</p><p>DM: Ok, you hit, roll your damage. You need a 4.</p><p>Player: I roll a 6.</p><p>DM: Ok, it's dead.</p><p></p><p>Scenario 2:</p><p>Player: I attack the orc</p><p>DM: Ok, what weapon are you using? Roll to attack.</p><p>Player: I'm using my magic broadword. I roll a 15.</p><p>DM: You plunge the sword into its shoulder. Roll your damage.</p><p>Player: I roll a 6</p><p>DM: Your sword cleaves through its shoulder and down through its chest and the orc falls in a bloody heap, dead.</p><p></p><p>The first is mechanical and uninteresting. The second leaves open the mystery of how dangerous the orc was, and how difficult it would be to kill even though everyone knows <em>generally </em>how difficult orcs are. If you amped or changed the stats for the particular orc, you leave open room for surprise and strangeness in the encounter -- "hey, this orc isn't acting like a typical orc!"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wolfpack48, post: 9347944, member: 6872648"] It’s really about how cleverly you operate the rules. I would never tell players they need a 9 to hit. Or that they need a 12 to disarm the trap. Or they need 12 damage to kill the monster. That's not immersive. They could eventually deduce those things after repeated attempts (if they really want to) but they aren’t told those things outright. The goal isn’t to reproduce a video game but rather replicate the tension you might experience if you were to actually encounter these things. But to be clear, all this isn't what I'm talking about when I mean challenge. I mean in-game challenges to the characters like the monsters themselves, traps, puzzles, mysteries that require player's head to help solve. Things like hiding the system ("roll a 12 to hit," "you take 7 hit points damage") are more to do with immersion than challenge. Look at these two scenarios, though, for how mystery and tension can be added to standard monsters: Scenario 1: Player: I attack the orc DM: Ok, roll, you need a 12. Player: I roll a 15. DM: Ok, you hit, roll your damage. You need a 4. Player: I roll a 6. DM: Ok, it's dead. Scenario 2: Player: I attack the orc DM: Ok, what weapon are you using? Roll to attack. Player: I'm using my magic broadword. I roll a 15. DM: You plunge the sword into its shoulder. Roll your damage. Player: I roll a 6 DM: Your sword cleaves through its shoulder and down through its chest and the orc falls in a bloody heap, dead. The first is mechanical and uninteresting. The second leaves open the mystery of how dangerous the orc was, and how difficult it would be to kill even though everyone knows [I]generally [/I]how difficult orcs are. If you amped or changed the stats for the particular orc, you leave open room for surprise and strangeness in the encounter -- "hey, this orc isn't acting like a typical orc!" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Player Skill" versus DM Ingenuity as a playstyle.
Top