Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Player skill vs character skill?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bill Zebub" data-source="post: 9811916" data-attributes="member: 7031982"><p>I get that, and I know most people play that way, and I played that way for years, and honestly I sometimes still do when I'm caught flat-footed by my players.</p><p></p><p>But some people on this forum...who weirdly all seem to have actually deleted their accounts ([USER=16814]@Ovinomancer[/USER], [USER=97077]@iserith[/USER], I can't think who else)...eventually persuaded me to rethink that.</p><p></p><p>The question I started to ask is: if the character has a reasonable chance of picking a lock then obviously it must not be game/adventure/plot breaking for them to succeed. So if there's no danger to trying to pick the lock, why not just let them succeed? What does it actually add to the game to make it a random outcome? If you want them to not be able to open the door so they will explore the other direction, then don't put a pickable lock on the door. If it genuinely doesn't matter which way they go, then...it genuinely doesn't matter. Let them pick the lock if they want. The role that lock should play is not a challenge to be overcome (because it's not; it's random, not challenging) but rather a signal for the players that something important is beyond it.</p><p></p><p>I know that what I'm saying is...unusual. "What? Just remove random chance and let them open all locks, recall all lore, find all secret doors, track all prey, bend all bars and lift all gates? All they have to do is declare the action and they succeed? That's crazy talk!"</p><p></p><p>But...yes. I do it, and it works not only fine but great. It means I have a LOT more work to do to prepare, because I can't just sprinkle some traps here, secret doors there, locked portcullises over here, slap on some DCs, and let them loose. It means my traps have to be challenging to deal with once discovered. The secret doors need to have interesting mechanisms to open them. Again, locked doors primarily are indicators of intent, not difficult obstacles to overcome. And if I actually want to stop them, if I actually want them to have to work to get through a door, then I can't just put a normal lock on it. Which....is what adventure design does anyway. If a designer wants you to have to go visit areas C, D, and E before opening the door from A to B, they don't just slap a higher DC on the lock. They make the lock rusty and broken, or whatever. </p><p></p><p>So what I'm really saying is that I think it's better to put design energy, and game session time, into the important doors, and stop trying to make a "game" out of rolling dice for things with no consequence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bill Zebub, post: 9811916, member: 7031982"] I get that, and I know most people play that way, and I played that way for years, and honestly I sometimes still do when I'm caught flat-footed by my players. But some people on this forum...who weirdly all seem to have actually deleted their accounts ([USER=16814]@Ovinomancer[/USER], [USER=97077]@iserith[/USER], I can't think who else)...eventually persuaded me to rethink that. The question I started to ask is: if the character has a reasonable chance of picking a lock then obviously it must not be game/adventure/plot breaking for them to succeed. So if there's no danger to trying to pick the lock, why not just let them succeed? What does it actually add to the game to make it a random outcome? If you want them to not be able to open the door so they will explore the other direction, then don't put a pickable lock on the door. If it genuinely doesn't matter which way they go, then...it genuinely doesn't matter. Let them pick the lock if they want. The role that lock should play is not a challenge to be overcome (because it's not; it's random, not challenging) but rather a signal for the players that something important is beyond it. I know that what I'm saying is...unusual. "What? Just remove random chance and let them open all locks, recall all lore, find all secret doors, track all prey, bend all bars and lift all gates? All they have to do is declare the action and they succeed? That's crazy talk!" But...yes. I do it, and it works not only fine but great. It means I have a LOT more work to do to prepare, because I can't just sprinkle some traps here, secret doors there, locked portcullises over here, slap on some DCs, and let them loose. It means my traps have to be challenging to deal with once discovered. The secret doors need to have interesting mechanisms to open them. Again, locked doors primarily are indicators of intent, not difficult obstacles to overcome. And if I actually want to stop them, if I actually want them to have to work to get through a door, then I can't just put a normal lock on it. Which....is what adventure design does anyway. If a designer wants you to have to go visit areas C, D, and E before opening the door from A to B, they don't just slap a higher DC on the lock. They make the lock rusty and broken, or whatever. So what I'm really saying is that I think it's better to put design energy, and game session time, into the important doors, and stop trying to make a "game" out of rolling dice for things with no consequence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Player skill vs character skill?
Top