Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Player Unrest...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marius Delphus" data-source="post: 679194" data-attributes="member: 447"><p>IME, a really good D&D campaign requires a sort of willing compromise between the DM and the players: the players agree to a little "following along" and the DM makes it interesting for them to do that. The players rein in any impulses they have to diverge markedly from what they see as the "plot," and the DM prepares a game that has a little flexibility of direction.</p><p></p><p>When did this change? In my day (waves cane), the DM presented a situation to the players and their characters took up arms and dealt with it. (I feel *old*. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )</p><p></p><p>I apologize if this sounds harsh, but IMHO a player who simply isn't willing to compromise in this way may not really belong in the group. Piratecat's solution is indeed the best if you want to keep the player... otherwise, it might be time for one of those "meaningful discussions" you always see on "Leave it to Beaver."</p><p></p><p>"Hey Beav, I think your character is a bad fit in my D&D game."</p><p>"Gee Wally, I didn't know you felt that way. I guess I've been kind of a jerk."</p><p>"Well, I shoulda talked to you sooner."</p><p>"I think I've had enough of the Lower Planes/meaningless monster hunting anyway."</p><p>"That's the spirit, Beav. I knew you'd come around."</p><p>"Being a DM is hard sometimes, huh Wally?"</p><p>"Yeah, but it's rewarding too Beav, like when I get Orcus to stomp your characters into the ground. Ha ha!"</p><p>"Ha ha!"</p><p></p><p>And everything is hunky-dory at the end of the half hour.</p><p></p><p>Or not. Specific free advice (take it or don't <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ):</p><p></p><p>demiurge: Bring on the demon cultists: take a page (or two) from the Book of Vile Darkness and show them what Evil *means*. Make sure it affects something they really cared about. I'm reminded of a second-hand story (was it in Dragon Magazine?) about an Evil PCs one-shot the DM ran to meet the players' expressed desire: the PCs *really* cut loose, apparently, with many sorts of behavior that needn't be mentioned in front of Eric's Grandma. Then when the regular campaign picked back up, the regular PCs walked in on the aftermath of the Evil PCs' unrestrained behavior... the story's writer said it was a *huge* wake-up call.</p><p></p><p>This approach (whether or not the players are allowed to do the marauding) has a significant chance of backfiring of course; 'tis not for those of us not involved in the situation to judge. </p><p></p><p>dshai: Same general idea: go ahead and bring the apocalypse. The characters don't feel like saving the world out of altruism? It should become *necessary*. Ideally, the players should come to realize, in a moment laden with drama and horror, "we could have prevented this!" where "this" is a scene that will really make them shudder (something on SHARK's scale ought to suffice... remember Helm's Deep? Imagine all the orcs are vrocks etc. instead, and led by four or five balors.)</p><p></p><p>HTH. YMMV. HAND.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marius Delphus, post: 679194, member: 447"] IME, a really good D&D campaign requires a sort of willing compromise between the DM and the players: the players agree to a little "following along" and the DM makes it interesting for them to do that. The players rein in any impulses they have to diverge markedly from what they see as the "plot," and the DM prepares a game that has a little flexibility of direction. When did this change? In my day (waves cane), the DM presented a situation to the players and their characters took up arms and dealt with it. (I feel *old*. :) ) I apologize if this sounds harsh, but IMHO a player who simply isn't willing to compromise in this way may not really belong in the group. Piratecat's solution is indeed the best if you want to keep the player... otherwise, it might be time for one of those "meaningful discussions" you always see on "Leave it to Beaver." "Hey Beav, I think your character is a bad fit in my D&D game." "Gee Wally, I didn't know you felt that way. I guess I've been kind of a jerk." "Well, I shoulda talked to you sooner." "I think I've had enough of the Lower Planes/meaningless monster hunting anyway." "That's the spirit, Beav. I knew you'd come around." "Being a DM is hard sometimes, huh Wally?" "Yeah, but it's rewarding too Beav, like when I get Orcus to stomp your characters into the ground. Ha ha!" "Ha ha!" And everything is hunky-dory at the end of the half hour. Or not. Specific free advice (take it or don't :) ): demiurge: Bring on the demon cultists: take a page (or two) from the Book of Vile Darkness and show them what Evil *means*. Make sure it affects something they really cared about. I'm reminded of a second-hand story (was it in Dragon Magazine?) about an Evil PCs one-shot the DM ran to meet the players' expressed desire: the PCs *really* cut loose, apparently, with many sorts of behavior that needn't be mentioned in front of Eric's Grandma. Then when the regular campaign picked back up, the regular PCs walked in on the aftermath of the Evil PCs' unrestrained behavior... the story's writer said it was a *huge* wake-up call. This approach (whether or not the players are allowed to do the marauding) has a significant chance of backfiring of course; 'tis not for those of us not involved in the situation to judge. dshai: Same general idea: go ahead and bring the apocalypse. The characters don't feel like saving the world out of altruism? It should become *necessary*. Ideally, the players should come to realize, in a moment laden with drama and horror, "we could have prevented this!" where "this" is a scene that will really make them shudder (something on SHARK's scale ought to suffice... remember Helm's Deep? Imagine all the orcs are vrocks etc. instead, and led by four or five balors.) HTH. YMMV. HAND. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Player Unrest...
Top