Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Players building v players exploring a campaign
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunseeker" data-source="post: 7123699"><p>Skyrim isn't a sim though. It's story-centric sandbox. You're also talking about a measure of time happening without actually mentioning it. Sure, if you stand around for days (since Skyrim has that) nothing will actually happen, because Skryim is still a story-centric sandbox (yay shades of gray). You can play around in the sand all you want, but the world itsself isn't going to change until you start playing through the main story. </p><p></p><p>I wasn't attempting to point to any specific game though. I was simply pointing out that a computer can track and calculate more things faster than a human. A better comparison would be research simulations on whether patterns, stellar phenomenon, migratory patterns of birds, etc.</p><p></p><p>Either example is <em>still</em> a facade. Neither are actual living, breathing worlds. I don't think computers or people have the processing power to simulate all that. But "tracking if the civil war is moving forward" is exactly what I mentioned. The DM isn't tracking each individual soldier until the party shows up (and still might not even then!) they may not even be tracking major players in the war, specific military divisions or whatnot, they may simply be rolling two die and deciding that "Red Side" rolled higher than "Blue Side" so Red Side has gained 1 point towards victory (requiring say, 100 points). The simulation only comes to life when the players get close enough to it. </p><p></p><p>It's basically the "view distance" on a 3D graphics setting. If you're too far away to see it, it doesn't stop it from being there, it just stops you from seeing the details.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Maybe, since you're essentially adding living beings to an artificial world (i'm assuming "groups" in this context means IRL players, not fancy AI NPCs). But now we're talking compounding interest. Sure, eventually you could put enough real people in a simulation to make the outside viewer question if it's a simulation but it still relies on smoke and mirrors and when all those people go home and go to bed, the game world "pauses" until they return (since play time does not always translate into real-world or in-game time), you might finish turning some gears, but even you too will stop and thus the game will stop.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunseeker, post: 7123699"] Skyrim isn't a sim though. It's story-centric sandbox. You're also talking about a measure of time happening without actually mentioning it. Sure, if you stand around for days (since Skyrim has that) nothing will actually happen, because Skryim is still a story-centric sandbox (yay shades of gray). You can play around in the sand all you want, but the world itsself isn't going to change until you start playing through the main story. I wasn't attempting to point to any specific game though. I was simply pointing out that a computer can track and calculate more things faster than a human. A better comparison would be research simulations on whether patterns, stellar phenomenon, migratory patterns of birds, etc. Either example is [I]still[/I] a facade. Neither are actual living, breathing worlds. I don't think computers or people have the processing power to simulate all that. But "tracking if the civil war is moving forward" is exactly what I mentioned. The DM isn't tracking each individual soldier until the party shows up (and still might not even then!) they may not even be tracking major players in the war, specific military divisions or whatnot, they may simply be rolling two die and deciding that "Red Side" rolled higher than "Blue Side" so Red Side has gained 1 point towards victory (requiring say, 100 points). The simulation only comes to life when the players get close enough to it. It's basically the "view distance" on a 3D graphics setting. If you're too far away to see it, it doesn't stop it from being there, it just stops you from seeing the details. Maybe, since you're essentially adding living beings to an artificial world (i'm assuming "groups" in this context means IRL players, not fancy AI NPCs). But now we're talking compounding interest. Sure, eventually you could put enough real people in a simulation to make the outside viewer question if it's a simulation but it still relies on smoke and mirrors and when all those people go home and go to bed, the game world "pauses" until they return (since play time does not always translate into real-world or in-game time), you might finish turning some gears, but even you too will stop and thus the game will stop. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Players building v players exploring a campaign
Top