Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Players choose what their PCs do . . .
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aramis erak" data-source="post: 7634898" data-attributes="member: 6779310"><p>There are a great many challenges for the character that are not for the player, and best resolved with simple mechanical considerations.</p><p></p><p>Some are just not things that players need to know, but the appropriate skill provides needed praxis the character needs. </p><p>EG: </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">which fork to use for dinner in the duke's hall.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">which of the swords in the blacksmith's are suitable for the character</li> </ul><p>Some are things that are not possible due to the mode of play being aural, rather than visual:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Identifying which of the maidens lying dead and naked is the duke's daughter</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">deciding which dress looks better when prepping to attend court.</li> </ul><p>Some things are simply too boring, gory, or technical to narrate out in detail: <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The making of the sword.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">searching 100 volumes in the library for clues</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">the repair of the warp drive</li> </ul><p>The only way these test the player is whether or not the character has the needed skills, and that is a challenge already made and in the "done deal" category... but the rolls involved are in the present.</p><p></p><p>Given that one can always choose to fail the saves in D&D... it's part of the larger challenge, which may require a bevy of tests... The hostile person is the challenge, usually not the individual attacks, tho' those may also be both mechanical and player-creativity-challenges.</p><p></p><p>I treat the term challenge as referring to a situation with at least two clear mutually exclusive outcomes, and the possibility of not attaining the desired one if it is chosen for the attempt.</p><p></p><p>Saving throws technically meet this some of the time... </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Undesired: hit by the spell for full damage</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Desired: damage reduced </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">highly desired: damage negated</li> </ul><p>Given the D&D premise that saves may always be intentionally failed...</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Undesired is, in this case, the default - do nothing, and take the damage</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Desired is a passed save. Chance of failure. Choosing it is the usual choice, because the default is also the undesired effect.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Highly desired is only possible if one uses a reaction ability. Not every character has such, but let's assume the character does. The challenge to the player is "do I use my 1 reaction?" The answer has many conditionals to consider, but most important is, "will I need to react to someone else?" coupled with, "will I lose my character if I don't?" The challenge to the character is the dive to cover or whatnot - resolved by the abstraction of the saving throw.</li> </ul><p></p><p>Except that some of us genuinely disagree with that premise, even caveated as it is...</p><p></p><p>In a game with a strong GM role, and a Gygaxian rule 0 (either <em>The GM can change the rules on a whim</em> or <em>The GM is always right</em>), the player never has the surety that the GM won't impose conditions on the character's mental state. The character also has no surety that any action, even walking, won't require a roll or even outright fail.</p><p></p><p>The best the player can assuredly pick what they attempt - everything else is subject to GM approval.</p><p></p><p>I've chased away players in the past by using conditions upon their characters that reduced the player's choice drastically. 1 unintended, 2 others much intended. A fourth attempted, but the player enjoyed the challenge. ≤Sigh≥...</p><p></p><p>The thing is, if a GM wants to keep players, they don't take away agency (control over the character) too easily nor too often, but the social contract of rules implies (at least in most Traditional table top RPGs) that there are 3 portions of control over a character - the player's, the GM, and the mechanics. </p><p></p><p></p><p>The same is true in videogames - the player determines the attempt (by triggering the action); the program determines the success/failure. I spent hours trying to climb certain peaks in Breath of the Wild... but, due to the mechanics and the setting choices of the designer, I could keep trying, but never succeed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aramis erak, post: 7634898, member: 6779310"] There are a great many challenges for the character that are not for the player, and best resolved with simple mechanical considerations. Some are just not things that players need to know, but the appropriate skill provides needed praxis the character needs. EG: [list][*]which fork to use for dinner in the duke's hall. [*]which of the swords in the blacksmith's are suitable for the character[/list] Some are things that are not possible due to the mode of play being aural, rather than visual: [list][*]Identifying which of the maidens lying dead and naked is the duke's daughter[*]deciding which dress looks better when prepping to attend court.[/list] Some things are simply too boring, gory, or technical to narrate out in detail:[list][*]The making of the sword. [*]searching 100 volumes in the library for clues[*]the repair of the warp drive[/list] The only way these test the player is whether or not the character has the needed skills, and that is a challenge already made and in the "done deal" category... but the rolls involved are in the present. Given that one can always choose to fail the saves in D&D... it's part of the larger challenge, which may require a bevy of tests... The hostile person is the challenge, usually not the individual attacks, tho' those may also be both mechanical and player-creativity-challenges. I treat the term challenge as referring to a situation with at least two clear mutually exclusive outcomes, and the possibility of not attaining the desired one if it is chosen for the attempt. Saving throws technically meet this some of the time... [list][*]Undesired: hit by the spell for full damage [*]Desired: damage reduced [*]highly desired: damage negated[/list] Given the D&D premise that saves may always be intentionally failed... [list][*]Undesired is, in this case, the default - do nothing, and take the damage [*]Desired is a passed save. Chance of failure. Choosing it is the usual choice, because the default is also the undesired effect. [*]Highly desired is only possible if one uses a reaction ability. Not every character has such, but let's assume the character does. The challenge to the player is "do I use my 1 reaction?" The answer has many conditionals to consider, but most important is, "will I need to react to someone else?" coupled with, "will I lose my character if I don't?" The challenge to the character is the dive to cover or whatnot - resolved by the abstraction of the saving throw.[/list] Except that some of us genuinely disagree with that premise, even caveated as it is... In a game with a strong GM role, and a Gygaxian rule 0 (either [I]The GM can change the rules on a whim[/I] or [I]The GM is always right[/I]), the player never has the surety that the GM won't impose conditions on the character's mental state. The character also has no surety that any action, even walking, won't require a roll or even outright fail. The best the player can assuredly pick what they attempt - everything else is subject to GM approval. I've chased away players in the past by using conditions upon their characters that reduced the player's choice drastically. 1 unintended, 2 others much intended. A fourth attempted, but the player enjoyed the challenge. ≤Sigh≥... The thing is, if a GM wants to keep players, they don't take away agency (control over the character) too easily nor too often, but the social contract of rules implies (at least in most Traditional table top RPGs) that there are 3 portions of control over a character - the player's, the GM, and the mechanics. The same is true in videogames - the player determines the attempt (by triggering the action); the program determines the success/failure. I spent hours trying to climb certain peaks in Breath of the Wild... but, due to the mechanics and the setting choices of the designer, I could keep trying, but never succeed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Players choose what their PCs do . . .
Top