Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Players, DMs and Save or Die
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ptolemy18" data-source="post: 3848512" data-attributes="member: 24970"><p>Save-or-dies... they're totally cool with me.</p><p></p><p>AS A PLAYER: If my character dies from some save-or-die effect, then that's just bad luck. I can't overstate enough that ***it is unhealthy and immature to be so attached to a particular character that you feel resentful or "cheated" if you lose them to a save-or-die effect* And I can't help but thinking that this is a motivation on the part of a lot of the players. If the DM overuses save-or-dies and keeps killing your characters, then that's a problem with having an obnoxious killer DM, not a problem with the system. </p><p></p><p>AS A DM: I understand that some DMs feel that save-or-dies may cause the potential destruction of their plot by killing some major NPC, etc., in a dramatic way. Well... **deal with it.** If a major NPC goes out to give a speech and gets in range of a Finger of Death and doesn't have some Death Ward magic in effect and fails their save, then you should have known that you risked it, and you should have a contingency plotline prepared. This is even stupider than complaining about the existence of Detect Lies and Know Alignment and Speak With Dead because you can't do that obviously-full-of-holes-and-not-meant-for-the-standard-D&D-setting murder mystery plot you were planning.</p><p></p><p>Only bad DMs drive the plot along on rails where it is "necessary" that the players accept the quest, or "necessary" that NPC X survives 'till the end. Not that a little bit of railroading isn't okay... but you have to be flexible. If the players kill your dumb end-of-the-dungeon dragon with a single failed spell, then you either let them enjoy their victory, or you have another monster waiting to take the dragon's place, so at least there's a fight scene.</p><p></p><p>D&D is about improvisation. It is about choices. It is about risk and randomness. You can never predict exactly whether your character is gonna die, you can never predict exactly whether your NPC is gonna die. You have to prepare for it, either as a DM or a player. If you don't, you are spoiling yourself.</p><p></p><p>SIDE NOTE: ....now, Save or Die effects that only work if the character is "blooded", that's a compromise I might be able to get behind...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ptolemy18, post: 3848512, member: 24970"] Save-or-dies... they're totally cool with me. AS A PLAYER: If my character dies from some save-or-die effect, then that's just bad luck. I can't overstate enough that ***it is unhealthy and immature to be so attached to a particular character that you feel resentful or "cheated" if you lose them to a save-or-die effect* And I can't help but thinking that this is a motivation on the part of a lot of the players. If the DM overuses save-or-dies and keeps killing your characters, then that's a problem with having an obnoxious killer DM, not a problem with the system. AS A DM: I understand that some DMs feel that save-or-dies may cause the potential destruction of their plot by killing some major NPC, etc., in a dramatic way. Well... **deal with it.** If a major NPC goes out to give a speech and gets in range of a Finger of Death and doesn't have some Death Ward magic in effect and fails their save, then you should have known that you risked it, and you should have a contingency plotline prepared. This is even stupider than complaining about the existence of Detect Lies and Know Alignment and Speak With Dead because you can't do that obviously-full-of-holes-and-not-meant-for-the-standard-D&D-setting murder mystery plot you were planning. Only bad DMs drive the plot along on rails where it is "necessary" that the players accept the quest, or "necessary" that NPC X survives 'till the end. Not that a little bit of railroading isn't okay... but you have to be flexible. If the players kill your dumb end-of-the-dungeon dragon with a single failed spell, then you either let them enjoy their victory, or you have another monster waiting to take the dragon's place, so at least there's a fight scene. D&D is about improvisation. It is about choices. It is about risk and randomness. You can never predict exactly whether your character is gonna die, you can never predict exactly whether your NPC is gonna die. You have to prepare for it, either as a DM or a player. If you don't, you are spoiling yourself. SIDE NOTE: ....now, Save or Die effects that only work if the character is "blooded", that's a compromise I might be able to get behind... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Players, DMs and Save or Die
Top