Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jan van Leyden" data-source="post: 6312003" data-attributes="member: 20307">The whole description sounds like a common situation turned on its head. In most cases it's the game master lamenting the fact that the players are less invested in the game than she is. You tell it like the players have more drive to game than you.I propose you either try to set up a schedule you're willing to stick to, even if it means fewer game days. If you become reliable again, I'm sure the players can be satisfied. The other approach would be to entice a player to run the game or take over the GMing duties for some time. This would take some burden off you.In the end you have to decide upon the priorities of your hobbies. RPGs have two points relevant to this case: you don't do it alone, and you can't do it as an isolated opportunity. Regard these parameters when setting your priorities and be sure to tell your players about the results.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jan van Leyden, post: 6312003, member: 20307"] The whole description sounds like a common situation turned on its head. In most cases it's the game master lamenting the fact that the players are less invested in the game than she is. You tell it like the players have more drive to game than you. I propose you either try to set up a schedule you're willing to stick to, even if it means fewer game days. If you become reliable again, I'm sure the players can be satisfied. The other approach would be to entice a player to run the game or take over the GMing duties for some time. This would take some burden off you. In the end you have to decide upon the priorities of your hobbies. RPGs have two points relevant to this case: you don't do it alone, and you can't do it as an isolated opportunity. Regard these parameters when setting your priorities and be sure to tell your players about the results. [/QUOTE]

Verification