Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6521510" data-attributes="member: 37579">There was a poll on this elsewhere on ENWorld. A solid majority of people reported no problem.--edit--Here's the poll:<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?366520-5E-Player-s-Handbook-owners-What-s-the-current-condition-of-your-book-s-binding&amp;highlight=binding" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?366520-5E-Player-s-Handbook-owners-What-s-the-current-condition-of-your-book-s-binding&amp;highlight=binding</a>70% report no problems. But keep in mind the reporting bias. People with bad binding are going to be more likely to complain while those whose book is in perfect condition won't bother voting. So the problem could be as high as 30% but is likely closer to 15-10%.&nbsp; Yes, it's bad. It's not good. It's far, far more than it should be. But it's not endemic . And it's within the range where even a reasonable QA process might have missed the scope of the problem.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 6521510, member: 37579"] There was a poll on this elsewhere on ENWorld. A solid majority of people reported no problem. --edit-- Here's the poll: [URL]http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?366520-5E-Player-s-Handbook-owners-What-s-the-current-condition-of-your-book-s-binding&highlight=binding[/URL] 70% report no problems. But keep in mind the reporting bias. People with bad binding are going to be more likely to complain while those whose book is in perfect condition won't bother voting. So the problem could be as high as 30% but is likely closer to 15-10%. Yes, it's bad. It's not good. It's far, far more than it should be. But it's not endemic . And it's within the range where even a reasonable QA process might have missed the scope of the problem. [/QUOTE]

Verification